Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects
- PMID: 19485714
- DOI: 10.3171/2009.3.FOCUS091
Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects
Abstract
Object: Decompressive craniectomy is an established procedure to lower intracranial pressure. Therefore, cranioplasty remains a necessity in neurosurgery as well. If the patient's own bone flap is not available, the surgeon can choose between various alloplast grafts. A review of the literature proves that 4-13.8% of polymethylmethacrylate plates and 2.6-10% of hydroxyapatite-based implants require replacement. In this retrospective study of large skull defects, the authors compared computer-assisted design/computer-assisted modeled (CAD/CAM) titanium implants for cranioplasty with other frequently used materials described in literature.
Methods: Twenty-six patients underwent cranioplasty with CAD/CAM titanium implants (mean diameter 112 mm). With the aid of visual analog scales, the patients' pain and cosmesis were evaluated 6-12 years (mean 8.1 years) after insertion of the implants.
Results: None of the implants had to be removed. Of all patients, 68% declared their outcomes as excellent, 24% as good, 0.8% as fair, and 0% as poor. There was no resulting pain in 84% of the patients, and 88% were satisfied with the cosmetic result, noting > 75 mm on the visual analog scale of cosmesis. All patients would have chosen cranioplasty again, stating an improvement in their quality of life by the calvarial reconstruction. Nevertheless, follow-up images obtained in 4 patients undergoing removal of meningiomas was only suboptimal.
Conclusions: With the aid of CAD technology, all currently used alloplastic materials are suited even for large skull defect cranioplasty. Analysis of the authors' data and the literature shows that cranioplasty with CAD/CAM titanium implants provides the lowest rate of complications, reasonable costs, and acceptable postoperative imaging. Polymethylmethacrylate is suited for primary cranioplasty or for long-term follow-up imaging of tumors. Titanium implants seem to be the material of choice for secondary cranioplasty of large skull defects resulting from decompressive craniectomy after trauma or infarction. Expensive HA-based ceramics show no obvious advantage over titanium or PMMA.
Similar articles
-
Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.Neurosurg Rev. 2012 Oct;35(4):527-35; discussion 535. doi: 10.1007/s10143-012-0376-3. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Neurosurg Rev. 2012. PMID: 22391771
-
Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma.J Craniofac Surg. 2007 May;18(3):526-32. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3180534348. J Craniofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17538313
-
Staged reconstruction of large skull defects with soft tissue infection after craniectomy using free flap and cranioplasty with a custom-made titanium mesh constructed by 3D-CT-guided 3D printing technology: Two case reports.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e13864. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013864. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30732124 Free PMC article.
-
Titanium cranioplasty in children and adolescents.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;44(7):789-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 4. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27174495 Review.
-
Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.Ann Plast Surg. 2019 May;82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001801. Ann Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 30973834
Cited by
-
Consensus on the prevention and repair of titanium mesh exposed wound after cranioplasty (2024 edition).Burns Trauma. 2024 Oct 23;12:tkae055. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae055. eCollection 2024. Burns Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39445225 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical management of a temporal meningoencephalocele with a patient-specific combined craniofossa prosthesis: illustrative case.J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024 Aug 5;8(6):CASE24132. doi: 10.3171/CASE24132. Print 2024 Aug 5. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024. PMID: 39102746 Free PMC article.
-
Complex oncologic resection and reconstruction of the scalp: Predictors of morbidity and mortality.Arch Craniofac Surg. 2020 Aug;21(4):229-236. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2020.00206. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32867412 Free PMC article.
-
Management of infections complicating the orbitocranial approaches: Report of two cases and review of literature.Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 26;6:89. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.157659. eCollection 2015. Surg Neurol Int. 2015. PMID: 26060598 Free PMC article.
-
Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Apr;156(4):805-11; discussion 811. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1992-6. Epub 2014 Feb 4. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014. PMID: 24493001 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous