Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):93-102.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-00124. Epub 2009 Jun 1.

Computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence and control: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence and control: a randomized trial

Farah Ahmad et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence and control (IPVC) is prevalent and can be a serious health risk to women.

Objective: To assess whether computer-assisted screening can improve detection of women at risk for IPVC in a family practice setting.

Design: Randomized trial. Randomization was computer-generated. Allocation was concealed by using opaque envelopes that recruiters opened after patient consent. Patients and providers, but not outcome assessors, were blinded to the study intervention.

Setting: An urban, academic, hospital-affiliated family practice clinic in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Participants: Adult women in a current or recent relationship.

Intervention: Computer-based multirisk assessment report attached to the medical chart. The report was generated from information provided by participants before the physician visit (n = 144). Control participants received standard medical care (n = 149).

Measurements: Initiation of discussion about risk for IPVC (discussion opportunity) and detection of women at risk based on review of audiotaped medical visits.

Results: The overall prevalence of any type of violence or control was 22% (95% CI, 17% to 27%). In adjusted analyses based on complete cases (n = 282), the intervention increased opportunities to discuss IPVC (adjusted relative risk, 1.4 [CI, 1.1 to 1.9]) and increased detection of IPVC (adjusted relative risk, 2.0 [CI, 0.9 to 4.1]). Participants recognized the benefits of computer screening but had some concerns about privacy and interference with physician interactions.

Limitation: The study was done at 1 clinic, and no measures of women's use of services or health outcomes were used.

Conclusion: Computer screening effectively detected IPVC in a busy family medicine practice, and it was acceptable to patients.

Primary funding source: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Ontario Women's Health Council.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00385034.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources