Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jun 2;150(11):752-65.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00003.

Short-term hormone therapy suspension and mammography recall: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Short-term hormone therapy suspension and mammography recall: a randomized trial

Diana S M Buist et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Without population-based evidence, some clinicians recommend short-term suspension of hormone therapy to improve the performance of mammography. Hormone therapy increases breast density, and abnormal screening mammograms are more common among women with denser breasts and among women using hormone therapy.

Objective: To test whether 1 to 2 months of hormone therapy suspension before screening mammography decreases additional mammographic imaging (recall) in women age 45 to 80 years.

Design: 3-group randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Integrated health plan in western Washington from 2004 to 2007.

Patients: 1704 women age 45 to 80 years who used hormone therapy at their most recent screening (index) mammography, were due for screening (study) mammography, and were still using hormone therapy.

Intervention: Block random assignment (by breast density and hormone therapy type) to no hormone therapy suspension (n = 567) or suspension for 1 month (n = 570) or 2 months (n = 567) before study mammography. One blinded expert radiologist interpreted all mammograms.

Measurements: Recall was the primary outcome, and change in mammographic breast density (percentage and dense area) between the index and study mammograms was the secondary outcome.

Results: Mammography recall rates were 11.3% (61 of 542 women in the no-suspension group), 12.3% (50 of 478 women in the 1-month suspension group), and 9.8% (44 of 451 women in the 2-month suspension group). No subgroups were identified in which brief suspension of hormone therapy resulted in decreased mammography recall. With suspension, decreases in percentage of breast density were orderly and statistically significant: 0.1% (no-suspension group), -0.9% (1-month suspension group), and -1.5% (2-month suspension group). Similar ordered decreases were observed for dense area. Women in the suspension groups experienced increased menopause symptoms.

Limitations: Results can only be generalized to women age 45 to 80 years who have used hormone therapy for at least 1 year and will consider short-term suspension; most eligible women (61%) declined participation. Mammography recall was determined by 1 expert radiologist.

Conclusion: Brief hormone therapy suspension was associated with small changes in breast density and did not affect recall rates. No evidence supports short-term hormone therapy suspension before mammography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment for READ Study
Figure 2
Figure 2
Difference Between Index and Study Mammogram in Means of Percent Breast density and Dense Area for 1-Month Suspension vs. No-Suspension and 2-Month Suspension vs. No-Suspension, by Age, Duration of Hormone Therapy Use, Body Mass Index, and Estrogen and Progestin strength

Comment in

Summary for patients in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2008. 2008
    1. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5 Part 1):347–360. - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute BCSC. Abnormal Interpretations for 4,032,556 Screening Mammography Examinations from 1996–2005. 2007
    1. Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(6):1373–1377. - PubMed
    1. Barton MB, Moore S, Polk S, Shtatland E, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(3):150–156. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types