Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;64(4):295-302.
doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000400005.

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible s. aureus in the saliva of health professionals

Affiliations

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible s. aureus in the saliva of health professionals

Milton Jorge de Carvalho et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009.

Abstract

Introduction: S. aureus is one of the main agents of nosocomial infection and is sometimes difficult to treat with currently available active antimicrobials.

Purpose: To analyze the prevalence of methicillin-susceptible S.aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) as well as the MRSA antimicrobial susceptibility profile isolated in the saliva of health professionals at a large public education hospital.

Materials and methods: The project was approved by the research and ethics committee of the institution under study. Three samples of saliva from 340 health professionals were collected. The saliva analysis used to identify S. aureus was based on mannitol fermentation tests, catalase production, coagulase, DNAse, and lecithinase. In order to detect MRSA, samples were submitted to the disk diffusion test and the oxacillin agar screening test. In order to identify the minimum inhibitory concentration, the Etest technique was used.

Results: The prevalence of MSSA was 43.5% (148/340), and MRSA was 4.1% (14/340). MRSA detected by the diffusion disk test, was 100% resistant to penicillin and oxacillin, 92.9% resistant to erythromycin, 57.1% resistant to clindamycin, 42.9% resistant to ciprofloxacin and 57.1% resistant to cefoxetin.

Conclusion: This subject is important for both the education of health professionals and for preventative measures. Standard and contact-precautions should be employed in professional practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Kluytmans. Belkun A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of S. aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Reviews. 1997;10(3):505–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coia JE, Duckworth GJ, Edwards DI, Farrington M, Fry C, Humphreys H, et al. Guidelines for the control and prevention of meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect. 2006;64(1):97–8. - PubMed
    1. Souza MV, Reis C, Pimenta FC. Revisão sobre a aquisição gradual de resistência de S.aureus aos antimicrobianos. Rev Patol Trop. 2005;34(1):27–36.
    1. De Lencastre H, Sa Figueiredo AM, Urban C, Rahal J, Tomasz A. Multiple mechanisms of methicillin resistance and improved methods for detection in clinical isolates of S. aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35(4):632–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Remonatto G, Cardoso CM, Marques CG, Silva AEB, Gelatti LC, Leite CFM. CA-MRSA: um patógeno emergente. NewsLab. 2007;80:92–6.

MeSH terms