[Roles of immunohistochemistry in prognostic assessment of basal-like breast cancer]
- PMID: 19489221
[Roles of immunohistochemistry in prognostic assessment of basal-like breast cancer]
Abstract
Objectives: Basal cell-like breast cancer is one of the subtypes using molecular typing, and this subtype attracted a wide spread attention. Currently, no uniform diagnostic criteria are available. Most studies demonstrated poor outcomes, but contradictory conclusions appeared recently. The prognosis of basal cell-like breast cancer using different immunohistochemical criteria were analyzed.
Methods: Two hundred and eighty-four invasive breast cancers with a follow-up information over 5 years were evaluated for ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, CK14, EGFR expression on tissue microarray immunohistochemically. Based on the results, these cases using four different diagnostic criteria were categorized, namely: Nielsen (ER-/HER2-, CK5/6+ and/or EGFR+), Kim (ER-/PR-/HER2-, CK5/6+ and/or CK14+ and/or EGFR+), Triple-negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-), and basal-CK (CK5/6+ and/or CK14+). 5-year survival information was compared between groups.
Results: The prevalence of basal cell-like breast cancer by Nielsen, Kim, Triple-negative and basal-CK were 15.5% (44/284), 14.8% (42/284), 43.3% (123/284) and 21.1% (60/284) respectively; the recurrence rates were 18.2% (8/44), 21.4% (9/42), 10.6% (13/123) and 11.7% (7/60) respectively. These were higher than recurrence rates for other subtypes, but only the differences by Nielsen's and Kim's criteria were significant. Using Nielsen's and Triple-negative's criteria, basal-like tumors showed shorter 5-year disease-free survival (both P < 0. 01) and overall survival (P < 0.05 and 0.01) than luminal A subtype, using Kim's criteria, basal-like tumors showed a lower 5-year disease-free but not overall survival than luminal A subtype (P < 0.01); no significant difference was found on 5-year survival between basal-like and non-basal-like tumors when typed by basal-CK.
Conclusion: Basal cell-like breast cancers are more likely to show more recurrence and worse outcome, but different immunohistochemical diagnostic criteria have an influence on their prognostic analysis, so a uniform diagnostic criteria is essential for the further study of basal-like breast cancers.
Similar articles
-
[Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of basal-like breast cancer].Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2009 May;38(5):316-22. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19575874 Chinese.
-
Apocrine carcinoma as triple-negative breast cancer: novel definition of apocrine-type carcinoma as estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative and androgen receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 May;42(5):375-86. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys034. Epub 2012 Mar 26. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22450930
-
[Clinical characteristics and survival in the operable breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;31(6):447-51. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19950556 Chinese.
-
Triple-negative breast cancer: current state of the art.Tumori. 2010 Nov-Dec;96(6):875-88. Tumori. 2010. PMID: 21388048 Review.
-
Triple-negative breast cancer: an unmet medical need.Oncologist. 2011;16 Suppl 1:1-11. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-S1-01. Oncologist. 2011. PMID: 21278435 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous