Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Aug;44(4):1169-87.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00967.x. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care

Rachel M Werner  1 , R Tamara Konetzka, Elizabeth A Stuart, Edward C Norton, Daniel Polsky, Jeongyoung Park
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care

Rachel M Werner et al. Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Evidence supporting the use of public reporting of quality information to improve health care quality is mixed. While public reporting may improve reported quality, its effect on quality of care more broadly is uncertain. This study tests whether public reporting in the setting of nursing homes resulted in improvement of reported and broader but unreported quality of postacute care.

Data sources/study setting: 1999-2005 nursing home Minimum Data Set and inpatient Medicare claims.

Study design: We examined changes in postacute care quality in U.S. nursing homes in response to the initiation of public reporting on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website, Nursing Home Compare. We used small nursing homes that were not subject to public reporting as a contemporaneous control and also controlled for patient selection into nursing homes. Postacute care quality was measured using three publicly reported clinical quality measures and 30-day potentially preventable rehospitalization rates, an unreported measure of quality.

Principal findings: Reported quality of postacute care improved after the initiation of public reporting for two of the three reported quality measures used in Nursing Home Compare. However, rates of potentially preventable rehospitalization did not significantly improve and, in some cases, worsened.

Conclusions: Public reporting of nursing home quality was associated with an improvement in most postacute care performance measures but not in the broader measure of rehospitalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk-Adjusted Trends in Postacute Care Quality The vertical dashed line represents November 2002, when Nursing Home Compare was launched.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. “Prevention Quality Indicators Overview. AHRQ Quality Indicators [accessed on March 5, 2009].” Available at http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/pqi_overview.htm. - PubMed
    1. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Elbel B, McNamara RL, Magid DJ, Nallamothu BK, Wang Y, Normand S-LT, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM. Hospital Quality for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Correlation among Process Measures and Relationship with Short-Term Mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;296(1):72–8. - PubMed
    1. Castle NG, Engberg J, Liu D. Have Nursing Home Compare Quality Measure Scores Changed over Time in Response to Competition? Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2007;16(3):185–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castle NG, Fogel BS, Mor V. Study Shows Higher Quality of Care in Facilities Administered by ACHCA Members. Journal of Long Term Care Administration. 1996;24(2):11–6. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. “Nursing Home Quality Initiatives Overview” [accessed on March 5, 2009]. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NursingHomeQualityInits/35_NHQIArchives.asp.

Publication types

MeSH terms