Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jun 2:2:23.
doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-2-23.

Molecular prognostic markers for adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics

Affiliations
Review

Molecular prognostic markers for adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics

Tara K Gregory et al. J Hematol Oncol. .

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous disorder that results from a block in the differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells along with uncontrolled proliferation. In approximately 60% of cases, specific recurrent chromosomal aberrations can be identified by modern cytogenetic techniques. This cytogenetic information is the single most important tool to classify patients at their initial diagnosis into three prognostic categories: favorable, intermediate, and poor risk. Currently, favorable risk AML patients are usually treated with contemporary chemotherapy while poor risk AML patients receive allogeneic stem cell transplantation if suitable stem cell donors exist. The largest subgroup of AML patients (aproximately 40%) have no identifiable cytogenetic abnormalities and are classified as intermediate risk. The optimal therapeutic strategies for these patients are still largely unclear. Recently, it is becoming increasingly evident that it is possible to identify a subgroup of poorer risk patients among those with normal cytogenic AML (NC-AML). Molecular risk stratification for NC-AML patients may be possible due to mutations of NPM1, FLT3, MLL, and CEBPalpha as well as alterations in expression levels of BAALC, MN1, ERG, and AF1q. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm if poorer risk NC-AML patients have improved clinical outcomes after more aggressive therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kell J. Emerging treatments in acute myeloid leukaemia. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2004;9:55–71. doi: 10.1517/14728214.9.1.55. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Estey EH. General approach to, and perspectives on clinical research in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:89–95. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tallmann MS. Curative therapeutic approaches to APL. Ann Hematol. 2004;83:S81–S82. - PubMed
    1. Mrózek K, Heinonen K, de la Chapelle A, Bloomfield CD. Clinical significance of cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Oncol. 1997;24:17–31. - PubMed
    1. Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA, Harrington DH, Theil KS, Mohamed A, Paietta E, Willman CL, Head DR, Rowe JM, Forman SJ, Appelbaum FR. Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Blood. 2000;96:4075–4083. - PubMed