The effect of gene drive on containment of transgenic mosquitoes
- PMID: 19490857
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.031
The effect of gene drive on containment of transgenic mosquitoes
Abstract
Mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue fever continue to be a major health problem through much of the world. Several new potential approaches to disease control utilize gene drive to spread anti-pathogen genes into the mosquito population. Prior to a release, these projects will require trials in outdoor cages from which transgenic mosquitoes may escape, albeit in small numbers. Most genes introduced in small numbers are very likely to be lost from the environment; however, gene drive mechanisms enhance the invasiveness of introduced genes. Consequently, introduced transgenes may be more likely to persist than ordinary genes following an accidental release. Here, we develop stochastic models to analyze the loss probabilities for several gene drive mechanisms, including homing endonuclease genes, transposable elements, Medea elements, the intracellular bacterium Wolbachia, engineered underdominance genes, and meiotic drive. We find that Medea and Wolbachia present the best compromise between invasiveness and containment for the six gene drive systems currently being considered for the control of mosquito-borne disease.
Similar articles
-
Gene drive systems for insect disease vectors.Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jun;7(6):427-35. doi: 10.1038/nrg1870. Nat Rev Genet. 2006. PMID: 16682981 Review.
-
Gene drive systems in mosquitoes: rules of the road.Trends Parasitol. 2005 Feb;21(2):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.11.004. Trends Parasitol. 2005. PMID: 15664528 Review.
-
Cage trials using an endogenous meiotic drive gene in the mosquito Aedes aegypti to promote population replacement.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Jan;74(1):62-8. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006. PMID: 16407347
-
Introducing desirable transgenes into insect populations using Y-linked meiotic drive - a theoretical assessment.Evolution. 2007 Apr;61(4):717-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00075.x. Evolution. 2007. PMID: 17439607
-
Mosquito transgenesis: what is the fitness cost?Trends Parasitol. 2006 May;22(5):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Mar 24. Trends Parasitol. 2006. PMID: 16564223 Review.
Cited by
-
Population dynamics of engineered underdominance and killer-rescue gene drives in the control of disease vectors.PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Mar 23;14(3):e1006059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006059. eCollection 2018 Mar. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018. PMID: 29570717 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamics of a combined Medea-underdominant population transformation system.BMC Evol Biol. 2014 May 7;14:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-98. BMC Evol Biol. 2014. PMID: 24884575 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the probability of CRISPR-based gene drive contaminating another species.Evol Appl. 2020 Apr 17;13(8):1888-1905. doi: 10.1111/eva.12939. eCollection 2020 Sep. Evol Appl. 2020. PMID: 32908593 Free PMC article.
-
Ecology of Gene Drives: The Role of Density-Dependent Feedbacks on the Efficacy and Dynamics of Two-Locus Underdominance Gene Drive Systems.Evol Appl. 2025 Mar 6;18(3):e70079. doi: 10.1111/eva.70079. eCollection 2025 Mar. Evol Appl. 2025. PMID: 40059885 Free PMC article.
-
Current CRISPR gene drive systems are likely to be highly invasive in wild populations.Elife. 2018 Jun 19;7:e33423. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33423. Elife. 2018. PMID: 29916367 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical