Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul;24(4):239-52.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp025. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control

Affiliations
Review

The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control

Regien G Biesma et al. Health Policy Plan. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

This paper reviews country-level evidence about the impact of global health initiatives (GHIs), which have had profound effects on recipient country health systems in middle and low income countries. We have selected three initiatives that account for an estimated two-thirds of external funding earmarked for HIV/AIDS control in resource-poor countries: the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria, the World Bank Multi-country AIDS Program (MAP) and the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). This paper draws on 31 original country-specific and cross-country articles and reports, based on country-level fieldwork conducted between 2002 and 2007. Positive effects have included a rapid scale-up in HIV/AIDS service delivery, greater stakeholder participation, and channelling of funds to non-governmental stakeholders, mainly NGOs and faith-based bodies. Negative effects include distortion of recipient countries' national policies, notably through distracting governments from coordinated efforts to strengthen health systems and re-verticalization of planning, management and monitoring and evaluation systems. Sub-national and district studies are needed to assess the degree to which GHIs are learning to align with and build the capacities of countries to respond to HIV/AIDS; whether marginalized populations access and benefit from GHI-funded programmes; and about the cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of the HIV and AIDS programmes funded by the GHIs. Three multi-country sets of evaluations, which will be reporting in 2009, will answer some of these questions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banteyerga H, Kidanu A, Bennett S, Stillman K. The System-Wide Effects of the Global Fund in Ethiopia: Baseline Study Report. Bethesda, MD: The Partners for Health Reformplus, Abt Associates Inc; 2005.
    1. Banteyerga H, Kidanu A, Stillman K. The systemwide effects of the Global Fund in Ethiopia: Final Study Report. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc; 2006.
    1. Bennett S, Fairbank A. The System-Wide Effects of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: A Conceptual Framework. Bethesda, MD: Partners for Health Reformplus; 2003.
    1. Bennett S, Boerma JT, Brugha R. Scaling up HIV/AIDS evaluation. The Lancet. 2006;367:79–82. - PubMed
    1. Brugha R. Evaluation of HIV programmes. British Medical Journal. 2007;334:1123–4. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms