Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Aug;90(2):429-37.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27491. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

Effects of vitamins C and E and beta-carotene on the risk of type 2 diabetes in women at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of vitamins C and E and beta-carotene on the risk of type 2 diabetes in women at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial

Yiqing Song et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-carotene are major antioxidants and as such may protect against the development of type 2 diabetes via reduction of oxidative stress.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of supplementation with vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-carotene for primary prevention of type 2 diabetes.

Design: In the Women's Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study, a randomized trial that occurred between 1995 and 2005, 8171 female health professionals aged > or =40 y with either a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or > or =3 CVD risk factors were randomly assigned to receive vitamin C (ascorbic acid, 500 mg every day), vitamin E (RRR-alpha-tocopherol acetate, 600 IU every other day), beta-carotene (50 mg every other day), or their respective placebos.

Results: During a median follow-up of 9.2 y, a total of 895 incident cases occurred among 6574 women who were free of diabetes at baseline. There was a trend toward a modest reduction in diabetes risk in women assigned to receive vitamin C compared with those assigned to receive placebo [relative risk (RR): 0.89; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.02; P = 0.09], whereas a trend for a slight elevation in diabetes risk was observed for vitamin E treatment (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.29; P = 0.07). However, neither of these effects reached statistical significance. No significant effect was observed for beta-carotene treatment (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.11; P = 0.68).

Conclusion: Our randomized trial data showed no significant overall effects of vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-carotene on risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women at high risk of CVD. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000541.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram illustrating diabetes outcomes in the randomly assigned treatment components of the Women's Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study (WACS). A total of 1597 participants who had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes at baseline were excluded in the analysis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes by randomized antioxidant intervention. (A) Active vitamin C compared with placebo; (B) active vitamin E compared with placebo; and (C) active β-carotene compared with placebo in the Women's Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the overall cumulative incidence over time for each active vitamin group and its corresponding placebo group. The log-rank test was performed to compute the P values for the differences.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Relative risks (95% CIs) of type 2 diabetes by 8 combinations of all 3 active antioxidant assignments relative to the all placebo group in the Women's Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate the estimates of relative risks and 95% CIs for each antioxidant treatment alone, after adjustment for age and other randomized treatments. We also tested interactions of the 3 antioxidant agents by using all of the 2-way and 3-way interaction terms in the Cox model and found no significant results. VC, vitamin C; VE, vitamin E; BC, β-carotene.

Comment in

  • Diabetes risk: antioxidants or lifestyle?
    Meydani M, Azzi A. Meydani M, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Aug;90(2):253-4. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28177. Epub 2009 Jun 24. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009. PMID: 19553302 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vijayalingam S, Parthiban A, Shanmugasundaram KR, Mohan V. Abnormal antioxidant status in impaired glucose tolerance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1996;13:715–9 - PubMed
    1. Evans JL, Goldfine ID, Maddux BA, Grodsky GM. Are oxidative stress-activated signaling pathways mediators of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction? Diabetes 2003;52:1–8 - PubMed
    1. Ceriello A, Motz E. Is oxidative stress the pathogenic mechanism underlying insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease? The common soil hypothesis revisited. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:816–23 - PubMed
    1. Gopaul NK, Manraj MD, Hebe A, et al. Oxidative stress could precede endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance in Indian Mauritians with impaired glucose metabolism. Diabetologia 2001;44:706–12 - PubMed
    1. Chin JH, Azhar S, Hoffman BB. Inactivation of endothelial derived relaxing factor by oxidized lipoproteins. J Clin Invest 1992;89:10–8 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data