Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;30(3):259-68.
doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109449. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of incidental liver lesions - an economical evaluation in comparison with multi-phase computed tomography]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of incidental liver lesions - an economical evaluation in comparison with multi-phase computed tomography]

[Article in German]
F L Giesel et al. Ultraschall Med. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to conduct a cost-minimization analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared to multi-phase computed tomography (M-CT) as the diagnostic standard for diagnosing incidental liver lesions.

Methods: Different scenarios of a cost-covering realization of CEUS in the ambulant sector in the general health insurance system of Germany were compared to the current cost situation. The absolute savings potential was estimated using different approaches for the calculation of the incidence of liver lesions which require further characterization.

Results: CEUS was the more cost-effective method in all scenarios in which CEUS examinations where performed at specialized centers (122.18-186.53 euro) compared to M-CT (223.19 euro). With about 40 000 relevant liver lesions per year, systematic implementation of CEUS would result in a cost savings of 4 m euro per year. However, the scenario of a cost-covering CEUS examination for all physicians who perform liver ultrasound would be the most cost-intensive approach (e. g., 407.87 euro at an average utilization of the ultrasound machine of 25 %, and a CEUS ratio of 5 %).

Conclusion: A cost-covering realization of the CEUS method can result in cost savings in the German healthcare system. A centralized approach as proposed by the DEGUM should be targeted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources