Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: postal questionnaire surveys
- PMID: 19493938
- PMCID: PMC2690619
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1735
Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: postal questionnaire surveys
Abstract
Objective: To study the career progression of NHS doctors, comparing men and women.
Design: Postal questionnaire surveys. Participants and setting Graduates of 1977, 1988, and 1993 from all UK medical schools.
Results: The response rate was 68% (7012/10 344). Within general practice, 97% (1208/1243) of men, 99% (264/267) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career, and 87% (1083/1248) of all women were principals. Median times from qualification to principal status were 5.8 (95% confidence interval 5.6 to 6.0) years for men, 5.6 (5.4 to 5.8) years for women who had worked full time during training, and 6.8 (6.5 to 7.0) years for all women. Of the 1977 and 1988 graduates in hospital practice, 96% (1293/1347) of men were consultants, compared with 92% (276/299) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career and 67% (277/416) of women who had not. Median time to first consultant post was 11.7 (11.5 to 11.9) years for men, 11.3 (11.0 to 11.6) years for women who worked full time during training, and 12.3 (12.0 to 12.6) years for all women. Women who had not always worked full time throughout their career were over-represented in general practice and under-represented in most hospital specialties, substantially so in the surgical specialties and anaesthetics. Women who had always worked full time were under-represented not only in the surgical specialties but also in general practice.
Conclusions: Women not progressing as far and as fast as men was, generally, a reflection of not having always worked full time rather than their sex. The findings suggest that women do not generally encounter direct discrimination; however, the possibility that indirect discrimination, such as lack of opportunities for part time work, has influenced choice of specialty cannot be ruled out.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
The future of female doctors.BMJ. 2009 Jun 3;338:b2223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2223. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19493927 No abstract available.
References
-
- Medical Manpower and Education Division. Medical and dental staffing prospects in the NHS in England and Wales in 1987. Health Trends 1988;4(20):101-9. - PubMed
-
- Department of Health. Hospital doctors: training for the future. The report of the working group on specialist medical training. London: Department of Health, 1993.
-
- Calman KC, Temple JG, Naysmith R, Cairncross RG, Bennett SJ. Reforming higher specialist training in the United Kingdom—a step along the continuum of medical education. Med Educ 1999;33:28-33. - PubMed
-
- Equal Opportunities Committee. Career barriers in medicine: doctors’ experiences. London: British Medical Association, 2004.
-
- Chief Medical Officer. Women in medicine: opportunity blocks. In: On the state of public health: annual report of the Chief Medical Officer 2006. London: Department of Health, 2007.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources