Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 10:11:161-9.
doi: 10.1007/s12575-009-9001-4.

Comparison of enzymatic and non-enzymatic means of dissociating adherent monolayers of mesenchymal stem cells

Comparison of enzymatic and non-enzymatic means of dissociating adherent monolayers of mesenchymal stem cells

Boon C Heng et al. Biol Proced Online. .

Abstract

The dissociation of adherent mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) monolayers with trypsin and enzyme-free dissociation buffer was compared. A significantly lower proportion of viable cells were obtained with enzyme-free dissociation buffers compared to trypsin. Subsequently, the dissociated cells were re-seeded on new cell culture dishes and were subjected to the MTT assay 24 h later. The proportion of viable cells that reattached was significantly lower for cells obtained by dissociation with enzyme-free dissociation buffer compared to trypsin. Frozen-thawed MSC displayed a similar trend, yielding consistently higher cell viability and reattachment rates when dissociated with trypsin compared to enzyme-free dissociation buffer. It was also demonstrated that exposure of trypsin-dissociated MSC to enzyme-free dissociation buffer for 1 h had no significant detrimental effect on cell viability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of viable MSC (as determined by trypan blue exclusion assay) upon dissociation with trypsin and enzyme-free dissociation buffer, before and after freeze–thawing in 10% (v/v) DMSO.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of viable reattached MSC upon dissociation with trypsin and enzyme-free dissociation buffer, with and without freeze–thawing in 10% (v/v) DMSO. This was assessed by MTT assay, 24 h after re-plating the dissociated cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Re-plated MSC after 24 h of culture upon dissociation with a Trypsin and b enzyme-free dissociation buffer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proportion of viable MSC (in free suspension) after dissociation with trypsin and incubation for 1 h in enzyme-free dissociation buffer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spitkovsky D, Hescheler J. Adult mesenchymal stromal stem cells for therapeutic applications. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(2):79–90. doi: 10.1080/13645700801969758. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones BJ, McTaggart SJ. Immunosuppression by mesenchymal stromal cells: from culture to clinic. Exp Hematol. 2008;36(6):733–741. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.03.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu Y, Wang J, Scott PG, Tredget EE. Bone marrow-derived stem cells in wound healing: a review. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15(Suppl 1):S18–S26. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00221.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tae SK, Lee SH, Park JS, Im GI. Mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomed Mate. 2006;1(2):63–71. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/1/2/003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toyoda M, Takahashi H, Umezawa A. Ways for a mesenchymal stem cell to live on its own: maintaining an undifferentiated state ex vivo. Int J Hematol. 2007;86(1):1–4. doi: 10.1532/IJH97.07055. - DOI - PubMed