Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2009 Jun 4:3:56.
doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-56.

Computational disease modeling - fact or fiction?

Affiliations
Editorial

Computational disease modeling - fact or fiction?

Jesper N Tegnér et al. BMC Syst Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Biomedical research is changing due to the rapid accumulation of experimental data at an unprecedented scale, revealing increasing degrees of complexity of biological processes. Life Sciences are facing a transition from a descriptive to a mechanistic approach that reveals principles of cells, cellular networks, organs, and their interactions across several spatial and temporal scales. There are two conceptual traditions in biological computational-modeling. The bottom-up approach emphasizes complex intracellular molecular models and is well represented within the systems biology community. On the other hand, the physics-inspired top-down modeling strategy identifies and selects features of (presumably) essential relevance to the phenomena of interest and combines available data in models of modest complexity.

Results: The workshop, "ESF Exploratory Workshop on Computational disease Modeling", examined the challenges that computational modeling faces in contributing to the understanding and treatment of complex multi-factorial diseases. Participants at the meeting agreed on two general conclusions. First, we identified the critical importance of developing analytical tools for dealing with model and parameter uncertainty. Second, the development of predictive hierarchical models spanning several scales beyond intracellular molecular networks was identified as a major objective. This contrasts with the current focus within the systems biology community on complex molecular modeling.

Conclusion: During the workshop it became obvious that diverse scientific modeling cultures (from computational neuroscience, theory, data-driven machine-learning approaches, agent-based modeling, network modeling and stochastic-molecular simulations) would benefit from intense cross-talk on shared theoretical issues in order to make progress on clinically relevant problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ESF Exploratory Workshop on Computational disease Modeling http://www.crm.cat/dismod/
    1. ELIXIR http://www.elixir-europe.org
    1. Gutenkunst RN, Waterfall JJ, Casey FP, Brown KS, Myers CR, Sethna JP. Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PloS Comput Biol. 2007;3:1871–78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stephan KE, Weiskopf N, Drysdale PM, Robinson PA, Friston KJ. Comparing hemodynamic models with DCM. Neuroimage. 2007;38:387–401. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeSchutter E. Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? PLOS Comp Biol. 2008;30;4:e1000078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources