Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;10(5):335-41.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.02.004.

Predictors of rehabilitation outcome among frail elderly patients living in the community

Affiliations

Predictors of rehabilitation outcome among frail elderly patients living in the community

Domenico Fusco et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Physical therapy is frequently offered to community-dwelling frail elderly as part of home care rehabilitation programs. A better knowledge of predictors of rehabilitative success could allow a better targeting of limited resources. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association of medical indicators of health status on functional recovery during rehabilitation of frail elderly living in the community.

Subjects: Subjects included 598 patients aged 70 years or more admitted consecutively to a home care rehabilitation program from January 2004 to December 2004.

Methods: A comprehensive geriatric multidisciplinary evaluation was offered to all patients, based on the Minimum Data Set for Home Care (MDS-HC) assessment form. Predictors of functional recovery were identified by a multiple logistic regression model. Data analyses were based on the items contained in the MDS-HC form.

Results: An improvement in ADL score was seen in 33% of patients, while the others remained unchanged or worsened. In multivariate analysis the negative predictors of functional improvement were as follows: cognitive impairment (OR 0.67; CI 0.60-0.74), depression (OR 0.89, CI 0.82-0.96), visual (OR 0.32, CI 0.21-0.50) and hearing impairment (OR 0.42, CI 0.27-0.67), and urinary (OR 0.21, CI 0.14-0.33) and bowel incontinence (OR 0.16, CI 0.10-0.26).

Conclusions: Cognitive impairment, depressed mood, sensory impairment, and incontinence are key factors that need to be assessed in order to individuate patients at risk of failure in rehabilitation. A targeted intervention in these areas could offer the opportunity of improving rehabilitation outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types