Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun 23;106(25):10219-23.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812619106. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

The water footprint of bioenergy

Winnie Gerbens-Leenes  1 , Arjen Y Hoekstra, Theo H van der Meer
Affiliations

The water footprint of bioenergy

Winnie Gerbens-Leenes et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

All energy scenarios show a shift toward an increased percentage of renewable energy sources, including biomass. This study gives an overview of water footprints (WFs) of bioenergy from 12 crops that currently contribute the most to global agricultural production: barley, cassava, maize, potato, rapeseed, rice, rye, sorghum, soybean, sugar beet, sugar cane, and wheat. In addition, this study includes jatropha, a suitable energy crop. Since climate and production circumstances differ among regions, calculations have been performed by country. The WF of bioelectricity is smaller than that of biofuels because it is more efficient to use total biomass (e.g., for electricity or heat) than a fraction of the crop (its sugar, starch, or oil content) for biofuel. The WF of bioethanol appears to be smaller than that of biodiesel. For electricity, sugar beet, maize, and sugar cane are the most favorable crops [50 m(3)/gigajoule (GJ)]. Rapeseed and jatropha, typical energy crops, are disadvantageous (400 m(3)/GJ). For ethanol, sugar beet, and potato (60 and 100 m(3)/GJ) are the most advantageous, followed by sugar cane (110 m(3)/GJ); sorghum (400 m(3)/GJ) is the most unfavorable. For biodiesel, soybean and rapeseed show to be the most favorable WF (400 m(3)/GJ); jatropha has an adverse WF (600 m(3)/GJ). When expressed per L, the WF ranges from 1,400 to 20,000 L of water per L of biofuel. If a shift toward a greater contribution of bioenergy to energy supply takes place, the results of this study can be used to select the crops and countries that produce bioenergy in the most water-efficient way.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Lowest value, highest value, and weighted-average global value of the WF for energy for 10 crops providing ethanol.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The weighted global average WF for 10 crops providing ethanol and for 2 crops providing oil for biodiesel.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Postel SL, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. Human appropriation of renewable freshwater. Science. 1996;271:785–788.
    1. Gleick PH. The human right to water. Water Policy. 1998;1:487–503.
    1. Postel SL. Entering an era of water scarcity: The challenges ahead. Ecol Appl. 2000;10:941–948.
    1. United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision, Highlights, Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP. Vol. 202. United Nations, New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2007.
    1. Fischer G, Shah M, van Velthuizen H, Nachtergaele FO. Global Agro-Ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century. Laxenburg, Austria: Int Inst Appl Syst Anal; 2001.

LinkOut - more resources