Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate
- PMID: 19498057
- PMCID: PMC2731809
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1776OC
Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate
Abstract
Rationale: Although there is a growing belief that physicians should routinely provide a recommendation to surrogates during deliberations about withdrawing life support, there is a paucity of empirical data on surrogates' perspectives on this topic.
Objectives: To understand the attitudes of surrogate decision-makers toward receiving a physician's recommendation during deliberations about whether to limit life support for an incapacitated patient.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, mixed methods study among 169 surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients. Surrogates sequentially viewed two videos of simulated physician-surrogate discussions about whether to limit life support, which varied only by whether the physician gave a recommendation.
Measurements and main results: The main quantitative outcome was whether surrogates preferred to receive a physicians' recommendation. Surrogates also participated in an in-depth, semistructured interview to explore the reasons for their preference. Fifty-six percent (95/169) of surrogates preferred to receive a recommendation, 42% (70/169) preferred not to receive a recommendation, and 2% (4/169) felt that both approaches were equally acceptable. We identified four main themes that explained surrogates' preferences, including surrogates' perceptions of physicians' appropriate role in life or death decisions and their perceptions of the positive or negative consequences of a recommendation on the physician-surrogate relationship, on the decision-making process, and on long-term regret for the family.
Conclusions: There is no consensus among surrogates about whether physicians should routinely provide a recommendation regarding life support decisions for incapacitated patients. These findings suggest that physicians should ask surrogates whether they wish to receive a recommendation regarding life support decisions and should be flexible in their approach to decision-making.
Figures
Comment in
-
Distinguishing messenger from message in delivering bad news.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.181.8.873a. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20382802 No abstract available.
-
Are physicians' recommendations on limiting life support really burdensome?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.181.8.873. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20382803 No abstract available.
References
-
- Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Garland MJ, Nelson CA. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment: impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:633–638. - PubMed
-
- Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Nelson CA, Fields J. Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients. Nurs Res 2001;50:105–115. - PubMed
-
- Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1163–1167. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources