Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;30(6):868-78.
doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.55.

Individual differences in responses to nicotine: tracking changes from adolescence to adulthood

Affiliations

Individual differences in responses to nicotine: tracking changes from adolescence to adulthood

Ming Li et al. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: The present study determined the extent to which individual differences in responses to the psychostimulating effect of nicotine during adolescence predict similar individual differences during adulthood in rats. We also examined the possible long-term effects of adolescent nicotine exposure on adult prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, a measure of sensorimotor gating ability.

Methods: During the adolescent phase, rats were administered saline, 0.10, 0.40, or 0.60 mg/kg nicotine via subcutaneous injections for 8 days, and motor activity was measured daily. During the adult phase, these rats were treated with the same nicotine dose as in adolescence for 8 additional days. The adolescent saline rats (now adults) were subdivided into four groups and administered saline, 0.10, 0.40, or 0.60 mg/kg nicotine, respectively. PPI was assessed 12 days after the last nicotine treatment.

Results: During both phases, nicotine increased motor activity across test days in a dose-dependent manner. Motor activity of rats treated with nicotine during adolescence was positively correlated with the activity recorded from the same rats during adulthood. In both phases, there were profound individual differences in the responses to the nicotine treatments. In addition, adolescent rats treated with nicotine did not show decreased motor response to the initial exposure to nicotine. Finally, adolescent exposure to nicotine at 0.4 mg/kg, but not adulthood exposure to the same dose of nicotine, produced a robust disruption of PPI, with individual rats showing different degrees of PPI disruption.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that adolescent rats have increased sensitivity to the psychostimulating effect and decreased sensitivity to the aversive effect of nicotine. Also, nicotine exposure during adolescence may have long-term detrimental effects on sensorimotor gating ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Motor activity (beam breaks) (group means±SEM) for the adolescent rats treated with nicotine 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6 mg/kg or saline from PND 28 to 35 and tested each day for 30 min. (B) Motor activity for the individual adolescent rats from the nicotine 0.4 mg/kg group over the 8 test days. bP<0.05 vs Sal-Sal group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Motor activity (beam breaks) (group means±SEM) for the adult rats that were previously treated with nicotine 0.1, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg or saline during adolescence and were retested with the same nicotine treatment during adulthood for 8 days. (B) Motor activity (# beam breaks) (group means±SEM) for the adult rats that were treated with saline during adolescence, and were tested with nicotine 0.1, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg or saline daily for 30 min during adulthood (8 days of treatment). bP<0.05 vs Sal-Sal group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Motor activity (beam breaks) (group means±SEM) for the adult rats that were previously treated with nicotine 0.1 mg/kg or with saline during adolescence and were later tested with nicotine 0.1 mg/kg during adulthood for 8 days. (B) Motor activity (beam breaks) (group means±SEM) for the adult rats that were previously treated with nicotine 0.4 mg/kg or with saline during adolescence and were tested with nicotine 0.4 mg/kg during adulthood for 8 days. bP<0.05 vs Sal-Nic 0.4 mg/kg group. (C) Motor activity (beam breaks) (group means±SEM) for the adult rats that were previously treated with nicotine 0.6 mg/kg or with saline during adolescence and were tested with nicotine 0.6 mg/kg during adulthood for 8 days. bP<0.05 vs Sal-Nic 0.6 mg/kg group. (D) Motor activity for the individual adult rats from the Nic-Nic 0.4 mg/kg group over the 8 test days. (E) Motor activity (beam breaks) (group means±SEM) for the 7 groups of adult rats in the final nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, sc) test. bP<0.05 vs Sal-Sal group; eP<0.05 vs Sal-Nic 0.1 mg/kg and Nic-Nic 0.1 mg/kg groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The long-term effect of adolescent nicotine exposure on PPI. Rats were tested in two different PPI procedures (Baseline day 1 and 2, and PPI day 3–5, see text for details). (A) PPIs for the two nicotine 0.1 mg/kg groups (Nic-Nic 0.1 mg/kg and Sal-Nic-0.1 mg/kg) and the saline control group over the 5 test days. Prepulses were 3, 6 or 12 dB above background (70 dB). (B) PPIs for the two nicotine 0.4 mg/kg groups (Nic-Nic 0.4 mg/kg and Sal-Nic-0.4 mg/kg) and the saline control group over the 5 test days. Prepulses were 3, 6 or 12 dB above background (70 dB). Asterisks indicate significant differences from the saline group. (C) PPIs for the two nicotine 0.6 mg/kg groups (Nic-Nic 0.6 mg/kg and Sal-Nic-0.6 mg/kg) and the saline control group over the 5 test days. Prepulses were 3, 6 or 12 dB above background (70 dB). (D) 76 dB PPIs for the individual adult rats from the Nic-Nic 0.4 mg/kg group over the 5 test days. bP<0.05 vs Sal-Sal groups. eP<0.05 vs Sal-Nic groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Motor activity averaged over the 8 nicotine test days for individual adolescent and adult nicotine-treated rats.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barron S, White A, Swartzwelder HS, Bell RL, Rodd ZA, Slawecki CJ, et al. Adolescent vulnerabilities to chronic alcohol or nicotine exposure: findings from rodent models. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29:1720–5. - PubMed
    1. DiFranza JR, Rigotti NA, McNeill AD, Ockene JK, Savageau JA, St Cyr D, et al. Initial symptoms of nicotine dependence in adolescents. Tob Control. 2000;9:313–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Millar WJ.Age of smoking initiation: implications for quitting Health Rep 1998939–46.(Eng); 39–48.(Fre). - PubMed
    1. Breslau N, Peterson EL. Smoking cessation in young adults: age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:214–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Matta SG, Sharp BM. Acquisition of nicotine self-administration in adolescent rats given prolonged access to the drug. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:700–9. - PubMed

Publication types