Effect of GI endoscopy nurse experience on screening colonoscopy outcomes
- PMID: 19500788
- PMCID: PMC2753217
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.059
Effect of GI endoscopy nurse experience on screening colonoscopy outcomes
Abstract
Background: The effect of the GI endoscopy nurse experience on colonoscopy outcomes is unknown.
Objective: To determine whether the nurse experience was associated with screening colonoscopy complications, procedure length, and cecal intubation.
Design: A retrospective analysis of screening colonoscopies performed by attending physicians between August 2003 and August 2005. Nurse experience was measured in weeks.
Setting: University of North Carolina Hospitals.
Subjects: Twenty-nine nurses were employed during the study period, 19 of whom were newly hired. A total of 3631 eligible screening colonoscopies were analyzed.
Main outcome measurements: The primary outcome was any immediate complication; secondary outcomes included time to cecum, total procedure time, and cecal intubation rate.
Results: In procedures staffed by nurses with 2 weeks of experience or less, 3.2% had complications compared with 0.3% for procedures with more experienced nurses (odds ratio [OR] 10.4 [95% CI, 3.55-30.2]). For nurses with 6 months or less of experience, 18% of procedures had cecal-intubation times more than 1 standard deviation above the mean compared with 12% for more experienced nurses (OR 1.60 [95% CI, 1.30-1.97]). Similar results were seen for the total procedure duration (OR 1.61 [95% CI, 1.32-1.97]) and cecal-intubation rates (OR 1.81 [95% CI, 1.37-2.39]). All relationships held after adjusting for potential confounding factors.
Limitations: A retrospective, single-center study.
Conclusions: GI endoscopy nurse inexperience is associated with an increase in immediate complications, prolonged procedure times, and decreased cecal-intubation rates for screening colonoscopies. These findings have implications for nurse training, procedure efficiency, colonoscopy quality assessment, and patient safety.
Figures
References
-
- Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–31. - PubMed
-
- Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60. - PubMed
-
- Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH, Adler DG, Egan JV, Faigel DO, et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:546–57. - PubMed
-
- Dominitz JA, Eisen GM, Baron TH, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC, et al. Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:441–5. - PubMed
-
- Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:251–61. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
