Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jun;52(3):793-796.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.015. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake?

Nanette Stroebele et al. Appetite. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

In a cross-over study, participants (n=59) were randomly assigned to receive either 100 kcal packs or standard size packages of snacks for 1 week. After a minimum of a 1-week washout period, participants received the other form of the snack for 1 week. Snack consumption was recorded by participants in a diary. Participants consumed an average of 186.9 fewer grams of snacks per week when receiving 100 kcal snack packs compared to standard size packages of snacks. Post hoc comparisons revealed the effect of package size depended on both randomization order and study week. Total grams of snacks consumed in week 1 differed significantly between the two randomized groups. In week 2, however, grams of snacks did not differ significantly between the two groups. This interaction was primarily due to a significantly lower consumption of snacks from standard size packages in the week following the portion-controlled packages. The results suggest that portion-controlled packaging reduce total intake from the provided snacks. Further, initial exposure to portion-controlled packages might have increased awareness of portion size such that less was consumed when larger packages were available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Grams of snacks (g) consumed per week by package size and study week. Repeated measures mixed models showed a significant difference by package size during week 1 (p<0.0001), but not for week 2 (p = 0.30)

References

    1. Ayala GX. An experimental evaluation of a group- versus computer-based intervention to improve food portion size estimation skills. Health Education Research. 2005;21:133–145. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellisle F. Impact of the daily meal pattern on energy balance. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition. 2004;48:114–118.
    1. Bellisle F, Dalix AM, Mennen L, Galan P, Hercberg S, de Castro JM, et al. Contribution of snacks and meals in the diet of French adults: a diet-diary study. Physiology & Behavior. 2003;79:183–189. - PubMed
    1. Cohen DA, Farley TA. Eating as an automatic behavior. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2008;5:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devitt AA, Mattes RD. Effects of food unit size and energy density on intake in humans. Appetite. 2004;42:213–220. - PubMed

Publication types