Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;75(15):5111-20.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00335-09. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale

Affiliations

Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale

Christian L Lauber et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Soils harbor enormously diverse bacterial populations, and soil bacterial communities can vary greatly in composition across space. However, our understanding of the specific changes in soil bacterial community structure that occur across larger spatial scales is limited because most previous work has focused on either surveying a relatively small number of soils in detail or analyzing a larger number of soils with techniques that provide little detail about the phylogenetic structure of the bacterial communities. Here we used a bar-coded pyrosequencing technique to characterize bacterial communities in 88 soils from across North and South America, obtaining an average of 1,501 sequences per soil. We found that overall bacterial community composition, as measured by pairwise UniFrac distances, was significantly correlated with differences in soil pH (r = 0.79), largely driven by changes in the relative abundances of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes across the range of soil pHs. In addition, soil pH explains a significant portion of the variability associated with observed changes in the phylogenetic structure within each dominant lineage. The overall phylogenetic diversity of the bacterial communities was also correlated with soil pH (R(2) = 0.50), with peak diversity in soils with near-neutral pHs. Together, these results suggest that the structure of soil bacterial communities is predictable, to some degree, across larger spatial scales, and the effect of soil pH on bacterial community composition is evident at even relatively coarse levels of taxonomic resolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
(A) Rarefaction results for soils with low (PE5), average (MT2), and high (CC1) levels of diversity. The same three soils were also used for Fig. 3. (B) Rarefaction results for the five dominant bacterial phyla across all soils combined. To make the patterns clear, we have shown rarefaction curves for only the first 20,000 sequences per group. PE5, Manu National Park, Peru, tropical forest soil, pH 3.6; MT2, Missoula, MT, temperate coniferous forest, pH 6.7; CC1, Cedar Creek LTER, United States, temperate grassland, pH 6.0.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Relative abundances of dominant bacterial taxa in all soils combined and in soils with different pH levels. The numbers above the columns indicate the number of soils included in each category. Relative abundances were estimated from the proportional abundances of classifiable sequences, excluding those sequences that could not be classified below the domain level. For additional taxonomic descriptions of the soil bacterial communities, see Tables S1A and S1B in the supplemental material.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Relationship between soil pH and soil bacterial diversity, measuring using Faith's PD (A) and the number of phylotypes (B), with phylotypes defined at the 97% sequence similarity level. Lines represent the best-fit quadratic model to the data. Unfilled triangles represent the three soils shown in Fig. 1A. Diversity indices were calculated using 1,200 sequences per soil sample.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling plots derived from pairwise Unifrac distances between soils, with symbols coded by general ecosystem type (A) and pH category (B).
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Correlations between relative abundances of the five dominant bacterial phyla and soil pH. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) are shown for each taxon, with the associated Bonferroni-corrected P values.

References

    1. Acosta-Martínez, V., S. Dowd, Y. Sun, and V. Allen. 2008. Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40:2762-2770.
    1. Andersson, A. F., M. Lindberg, H. Jakobsson, F. Bäckhed, P. l. Nyrén, and L. Engstrand. 2008. Comparative analysis of human gut microbiota by barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 3:e2836. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bääth, E., and T. H. Anderson. 2003. Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35:955-963.
    1. Blagodatskaya, E. V., and T. H. Anderson. 1998. Interactive effects of pH and substrate quality on the fungal-to-bacterial ratio and qCO2 of microbial communities in forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30:1269-1274.
    1. Borneman, J., and E. W. Triplett. 1997. Molecular microbial diversity in soils from eastern Amazonia: evidence for unusual microorganisms and microbial population shifts associated with deforestation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2647-2653. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types