Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Jun 15;87(11):1672-80.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a5cf3f.

Orthotopic liver transplantation: T-tube or not T-tube? Systematic review and meta-analysis of results

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Orthotopic liver transplantation: T-tube or not T-tube? Systematic review and meta-analysis of results

Georgios C Sotiropoulos et al. Transplantation. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after duct-to-duct anastomoses with or without biliary T-tube in orthotopic liver transplantation.

Methods: We pooled the outcomes of 1027 patients undergoing choledocho-choledochostomy with or without T-tube in 9 of 46 screened trials by means of fixed or random effects models.

Results: The "without T-tube" and "with T-tube" groups had equivalent outcomes for: anastomotic bile leaks or fistulas, choledocho-jejunostomy revisions, dilatation and stenting, hepatic artery thromboses, retransplantation, and mortality due to biliary complications. The "without T-tube" group had better outcomes when considering "fewer episodes of cholangitis," "fewer episodes of peritonitis," and showed a favorable trend for "overall biliary complications." Although the "with T-tube" group showed superior result for "anastomotic and nonanastomotic strictures," the incidence of interventions was not diminished.

Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta analysis favor the abandonment of T-tubes in orthotopic liver transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms