Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep;85(9):561-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jun 7.

Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: pilot study

Xiaomei Cong  1 , Susan M Ludington-Hoe, Gail McCain, Pingfu Fu
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: pilot study

Xiaomei Cong et al. Early Hum Dev. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Heel stick is the most common painful procedure for preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units. Resultant pain causes adverse physiological effects in major organ systems. Kangaroo Care (KC), involving mother-infant skin-to-skin contact is a promising analgesic for infant pain; however, the effect of KC on the autonomic nervous system's response to pain is unknown.

Aim: To determine if KC results in improved balance in autonomic responses to heel stick pain than the standard method where infants remain in an incubator care (IC) for the heel stick.

Study design: A randomized cross-over trial.

Subjects: Fourteen preterm infants, 30-32 weeks gestational age and less than 9 days postnatal age.

Outcome measures: Infant behavioral state, heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV) indices including low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) power, and the LF/HF ratio measured over Baseline, Heel Warming, Heel Stick, and Recovery periods in KC and IC conditions.

Results: HRV differences between KC and IC were that LF was higher in KC at Baseline (p<.01) and at Heel Stick (p<.001), and HF was higher in KC at Baseline than in the IC condition (p<.05). The LF/HF ratio had less fluctuation across the periods in KC than in IC condition and was significantly lower during Recovery in KC than in IC (p<.001).

Conclusions: Infants experienced better balance in response in KC than IC condition as shown by more autonomic stability during heel stick. KC may be helpful in mediating physiologic response to painful procedures in preterm infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Authors have reported no relevant financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence their work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram of enrollment, allocation, follow-up, and data analysis. KC = Kangaroo Care heel stick condition; IC = Incubator heel stick condition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
HRV indices across four periods in the KC and IC conditions. KC = Kangaroo Care condition; IC = incubator care condition; LF = low frequency power (predominately sympathetic activity); HF = high frequency power (parasympathetic activity); LF/HF = Low/High frequency power ratio (balance of sympathetic-parasympathetic activity).
Figure 2
Figure 2
HRV indices across four periods in the KC and IC conditions. KC = Kangaroo Care condition; IC = incubator care condition; LF = low frequency power (predominately sympathetic activity); HF = high frequency power (parasympathetic activity); LF/HF = Low/High frequency power ratio (balance of sympathetic-parasympathetic activity).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stevens B, McGrath P, Gibbins S, Beyene J, Breau L, Camfield C, et al. Procedural pain in newborns at risk for neurologic impairment. Pain. 2003 Sep;105(12):27–35. - PubMed
    1. Barker DP, Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F47–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simons SH, van Dijk M, Anand KS, Roofthooft D, van Lingen RA, Tibboel D. Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1058–64. - PubMed
    1. Porter FL, Anand KJS. Epidemiology of pain in neonates. Research & Clinical Forums. 1998;20:9–16.
    1. Evans JC, McCartney EM, Lawhon G, Galloway J. Longitudinal comparison of preterm pain responses to repeated heelsticks. Pediatr Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;31(3):216–21. - PubMed

Publication types