Contraceptive choices--turning back the clock

Abstract

Contraceptive choices are being reduced rather than being expanded in many parts of the world, particularly in Western countries. Although this paper presents an Australian perspective, the concerns are shared by family planners in other countries. The reasons for this are multiple and complex and often interrelated but ultimately depend on commercial considerations. The community expectation is that an ideal contraceptive can and does exist, but the media sensationalization of contraceptive problems has given many contraceptive methods a poor image. Contraceptive availability is also affected by liability issues, which have increased the cost of product liability insurance, and medical liability insurance of health professionals, increasing both the cost of contraceptives to the individual and the availability of services such as IUD insertions and sterilization, as practitioners withdraw their services, due to cost of insurance. The cost of marketing a new contraceptive from the time the idea is first developed until it is approved for marketing also deters manufacturers from developing new contraceptives. Delays in drug evaluation procedures in many countries deters companies with already well established contraceptives from marketing them in such countries. The effect of political stands by radical feminists or consumer groups, also effect both the image and the availability of contraceptives, as can be seen with the saga of Depo-Provera, RU486 and intrauterine devices. Similarly, the moral perceptions of anti-abortion groups and health care providers is also a threat to fertility control services. Possible solutions to some of these problems are offered in the paper.