Hip psychometrics
- PMID: 19507196
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.3616
Hip psychometrics
Abstract
When data are abundant relative to the number of questions asked of them, answers can be formulated using little more than those data. But when data grow more sparse, so too does our tendency to lean on strong models to help us draw inferences. In this research we show how a strong item response model embedded within a fully Bayesian framework allows us to answer two important questions about the reliability and consistency of the clinical diagnosis of hip fractures from very limited data. We also show how the model automatically adjusts diagnoses for biases among the surgeons judging the radiographs. This research illustrates how a Bayesian approach expands the range of problems on which item response models can profitably be used.
Similar articles
-
Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Feb;72(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/000164701753606662. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001. PMID: 11327411
-
MRI diagnosis of occult hip fractures.Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):524-30. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041510. Acta Orthop. 2005. PMID: 16195069
-
Radiographs of hip fractures were digitally altered to mask surgeons to the type of implant without compromising the reliability of quality ratings or making the rating process more difficult.J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):214-223.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Sep 7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 18778914
-
Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.Injury. 2010 Jul;41(7):739-45. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.018. Epub 2010 Apr 14. Injury. 2010. PMID: 20394921 Review.
-
Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Jul;29(4):507-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 23. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008. PMID: 18201944 Review.
Cited by
-
Using R and WinBUGS to fit a generalized partial credit model for developing and evaluating patient-reported outcomes assessments.Stat Med. 2012 Aug 15;31(18):2010-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4475. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Stat Med. 2012. PMID: 22362655 Free PMC article.
-
Using SAS PROC MCMC for Item Response Theory Models.Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Aug;75(4):585-609. doi: 10.1177/0013164414551411. Epub 2014 Sep 25. Educ Psychol Meas. 2015. PMID: 29795834 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling Diagnostic Expertise in Cases of Irreducible Uncertainty: The Decision-Aligned Response Model.Acad Med. 2023 Jan 1;98(1):88-97. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004918. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Acad Med. 2023. PMID: 36576770 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring differences in adverse symptom event grading thresholds between clinicians and patients in the clinical trial setting.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;143(4):735-743. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2335-9. Epub 2017 Jan 16. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28093637 Free PMC article.
-
Application of a Bayesian graded response model to characterize areas of disagreement between clinician and patient grading of symptomatic adverse events.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Dec 4;2(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0086-x. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018. PMID: 30515599 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical