Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos
- PMID: 19513822
- PMCID: PMC2729856
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9318-6
Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of vitrification and slow freezing for the cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos in terms of post-warming survival rate, post-warming embryo morphology and clinical outcomes.
Methods: The embryos of 305 patients at cleavage stages were cryopreserved either with vitrification (153 patients) or slow-freezing (152 patients) methods. After warming; the survival rate, post-warmed embryo morphology, clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Result(s): In the vitrification group versus slow freezing group, the survival rate (96.9% vs. 82.8%) and the post-warmed excellent morphology with all blastomeres intact (91.8% vs. 56.2%) were higher with an odds ratio of 6.607 (95% confidence interval; 4.184-10.434) and 8.769 (95% confidence interval; 6.460-11.904), respectively. In this group, the clinical pregnancy rate (40.5% vs. 21.4%) and the implantation rate (16.6% vs. 6.8%) were also higher with an odds ratio of 2.427 (95%confidence interval; 1.461-4.033) and 2.726 (95% confidence interval; 1.837-4.046), respectively.
Conclusion(s): Vitrification in contrast to slow freezing is an efficient method for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos. Vitrification provides a higher survival rate, minimal deleterious effects on post-warming embryo morphology and it can improve clinical outcomes.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1038/305707a0', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1038/305707a0'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '6633637', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6633637/'}]}
- Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305:707–9. doi:10.1038/305707a0. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '4054343', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4054343/'}]}
- Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1, 2 propanediol. Fertil Sterli. 1985;44:645–51. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15820053', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15820053/'}]}
- Anderson AR, Wilkinson SS, Prince S, Crain JL. Reduction of high order multiples in frozen embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:402–5. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '1704816', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1704816/'}]}
- Mazur P. Equilibrium, quasi-equilibrium, and nonequilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell Biophys. 1990;17:53–92. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16274602', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16274602/'}]}
- Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:434–7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
