Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun 10:4:13.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-4-13.

An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations

Affiliations

An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations

Natasha Just et al. J Occup Med Toxicol. .

Abstract

The Canadian poultry production industry contributes nearly $10 billion to the Canadian economy and employs nearly 50,000 workers. However, modern poultry facilities are highly contaminated with airborne dust. Although there are many bioaerosols in the poultry barn environment, endotoxin is typically attributed with the negative respiratory symptoms observed in workers. These adverse respiratory symptoms have a higher prevalence in poultry workers compared to workers from other animal confinement buildings. Workers in cage-housed operations compared to floor-housed facilities report a higher prevalence of some respiratory symptoms. We review the current state of knowledge on airborne dust in poultry barns and respiratory dysfunction in poultry workers while highlighting the areas that need further investigation. Our review focuses on the aerobiological pathway of poultry dust including the source and aerosolization of dust and worker exposure and response. Further understanding of the source and aerosolization of dust in poultry operations will aid in the development of management practices to reduce worker exposure and response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aerobiological pathway of dust in poultry facilities. Common factors influencing each stage of the pathway are indicated in the grey boxes, specific cage-housed factors are highlighted in black boxes and floor-housed factors are outlined in white boxes. Remediation opportunities for each stage of the pathway are indicated at the left.

References

    1. Chicken Farmers of Canada http://www.chicken.ca/DefaultSite/index.aspx?CategoryID=5&lang=en-CA
    1. Wathes CM, Holden MR, Sneath RW, White RP, Phillips VR. Concentrations and emission rates of aerial ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, dust and endotoxin in UK broiler and layer houses. Br Poult Sci. 1997;38:14–28. doi: 10.1080/00071669708417936. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whyte RT. Aerial pollutants and the health of poultry farmers. World's Poultry Science Journal. 1993;49:139–153. doi: 10.1079/WPS19930012. - DOI
    1. Rylander R, Carvalheiro MF. Airways inflammation among workers in poultry houses. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:487–490. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0072-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radon K, Weber C, Iversen M, Danuser B, Pedersen S, Nowak D. Exposure assessment and lung function in pig and poultry farmers. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:405–410. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.6.405. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources