Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;125(1):79-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

Prospective diagnostic accuracy assessment of the HemosIL HS D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients

Affiliations

Prospective diagnostic accuracy assessment of the HemosIL HS D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients

D Mark Courtney et al. Thromb Res. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Chest pain and shortness of breath are among the most common symptoms requiring immediate evaluation. Testing for pulmonary embolism (PE) has become easier and widespread due to D-dimer blood tests. Safe use of these tests is only possible if sensitivity is high and they are used in non-high probability patients. We evaluated diagnostic performance of the HemosIL HS D-dimer, which despite FDA approval in 2005, has been minimally reported in prospective standard clinical care.

Materials and methods: We used a prospective observational study design to follow patients in a single center with the HemosIL HS ordered for symptoms of possible PE with positive test result if >243 ng/ml. The outcome was PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at the time of presentation or subsequent 45 days determined by structured evaluation of imaging tests, phone, or medical record follow-up in all patients.

Results: 529 patients received a D-dimer and 4.7% were ultimately diagnosed with PE or DVT. The sensitivity of the HemosIL HS was 96.0% (95% CI; 79.6 to 99.9%) specificity was 65.7% (95% CI; 61.4 to 69.8%) and likelihood ratio negative was 0.06 (95% CI; 0.01 to 0.42). The probability of PE in patients with a negative D-dimer was 1/332 or 0.3% (95% CI; 0.01% to 1.67%). The receiver operator curve had an area under the curve of 0.87 and supported the current cut-point as optimal.

Conclusions: The HemosIL HS D-dimer had high sensitivity, very low negative post-test probability and is useful in excluding PE in the acute care setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Course of care
Standard algorithm guiding routine care and decision making for patients requiring testing for pulmonary embolism.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Patient outcomes
Figure 3
Figure 3. D-dimer receiver operator curve
receiver operator characteristic curve demonstrating overall diagnostic performance of the HemosIL HS D-dimer. The Y axis plots sensitivity (true positive rate); the X axis plots 1-specificity (the false positive rate). The area under the curve is 0.87 with 95% confidence interval of 0.84 to 0.90.

References

    1. McCaig LF, Nawar EW. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv data. 2006;372:1–29. - PubMed
    1. Kline JA, Webb WB, Jones AE, Hernandez-Nino J. Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:490–502. - PubMed
    1. Kabrhel C, Matts C, McNamara M, Katz J, Ptak T. A highly sensitive ELISA D-dimer increases testing but not diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:519–524. - PubMed
    1. Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, Biel RK, Bharadia V, Kalra NK. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:589–602. - PubMed
    1. Wells PS. Integrated strategies for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Hemost. 2007;5(Supplement 1):41–50. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances