Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun 14;15(22):2714-22.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2714.

Higher CO2-insufflation pressure inhibits the expression of adhesion molecules and the invasion potential of colon cancer cells

Affiliations

Higher CO2-insufflation pressure inhibits the expression of adhesion molecules and the invasion potential of colon cancer cells

Jun-Jun Ma et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the influence of CO(2)-insufflation pressure on adhesion, invasion and metastatic potential of colon cancer cells based on adhesion molecules expression.

Methods: With an in vitro artificial pneumoperitoneum model, SW1116 human colon carcinoma cells were exposed to CO(2)-insufflation in 5 different pressure groups: 6 mmHg, 9 mmHg, 12 mmHg, 15 mmHg and control group, respectively for 1 h. Expression of E-cadherin, ICAM-1, CD44 and E-selectin was measured at 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after CO(2)-insufflation using flow cytometry. The adhesion and invasion capacity of SW1116 cells before and after exposure to CO(2)-insufflation was detected by cell adhesion/invasion assay in vitro. Each group of cells was injected intraperitoneally into 16 BALB/C mice. The number of visible abdominal cavity tumor nodules, visceral metastases and survival of the mice were recorded in each group.

Results: The expression of E-cadherin, ICAM-1, CD44 and E-selectin in SW1116 cells were changed significantly following exposure to CO(2) insufflation at different pressures (P < 0.05). The expression of E-cadherin, CD44 and ICAM-1 decreased with increasing CO(2)-insufflation pressure. The adhesive/invasive cells also decreased gradually with increasing pressure as determined by the adhesion/invasion assay. In animal experiments, the number of abdominal cavity tumor nodules in the 15 mmHg group was also significantly lower than that in the 6 mmHg group (29.7 +/- 9.91 vs 41.7 +/- 14.90, P = 0.046). However, the survival in each group was not statistically different.

Conclusion: CO(2)-insufflation induced a temporary change in the adhesion and invasion capacity of cancer cells in vitro. Higher CO(2)-insufflation pressure inhibited adhesion, invasion and metastatic potential in vitro and in vivo, which was associated with reduced expression of adhesion molecules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Five litres volume airtight Perspex box with two ventilating ports for pneumoperitoneum establishment in vitro.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow cytometry analysis of ICAM-1 and E-cadherin expression in SW1116. A: ICAM-1 (Room air control); B: ICAM-1 (0 h after the 6 mmHg insufflation); C: ICAM-1 (72 h after the 6 mmHg insufflation); D: E-cadherin (Room air control); E: E-cadherin (24 h after the 9 mmHg insufflation); F: E-cadherin (72 h after the 9 mmHg insufflation). Immediately after the 6 mmHg CO2 insufflation (B), ICAM-1 expression increased significantly compared to room air controls (A) (P = 0.009), while it was significantly less at 72 h after the 6 mmHg insufflation (C) than control group. Twenty four hours after 9 mmHg CO2 insufflation (E), E-cadherin expression increased significantly compared to controls (D) (P = 0.035), but returned to the control value at 72 h after the 9 mmHg insufflation (F).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effect of CO2 insufflation pressure on expression of adhesion molecules. A: Expression of CD44; B: Expression of E-cadherin; C: Expression of ICAM-1. With increasing CO2-insufflation pressure, the expression of CD44 (A), E-cadherin (B), and ICAM-1 (C) decreased at some time points, especially at the start (0 h) after CO2-insufflation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of adhesion assay. A: 0 h after CO2 insufflation; B: 72 h after CO2 insufflation. At 0 h after CO2 insufflation (A), with increasing CO2-insufflation pressure, the adhesion of the SW1116 cell line decreased gradually (12 mmHg vs control, P < 0.001; 15 mmHg vs 12 mmHg, P < 0.001). At 72 h after CO2 insufflation (B), cell adhesion was similar among the different groups (P > 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Results of invasion assay. A: SW1116, 0 h after exposure; B: SW1116, 72 h after exposure; C: Lovo, 0 h after exposure; D: Lovo, 72 h after exposure. A: 1At 0 h after exposure to 15 mmHg CO2 insufflation, invasive cells decreased significantly compared to the cells prior to exposure (P = 0.019); 2At 0 h after exposure, invasion of the 6 mmHg or the 15 mmHg group was significantly different from the other pressure groups (P < 0.05). B: The invasion fluorescence intensities of SW1116 before and 72 h after exposure to CO2 insufflation were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Seventy two hours after the CO2 insufflation, there were no significant differences between the various insufflation pressure groups (P > 0.05); C: 1At 0 h after exposure to 15 mmHg, 12 mmHg or 6 mmHg CO2 insufflation, invasive cells of Lovo decreased significantly compared to the cells prior to exposure (P = 0.008, P = 0.0045, P = 0.043); 2At 0 h after exposure, cell invasion at 6 mmHg was significantly different from the other pressure groups (P < 0.01); 3At 0 h after exposure, cell invasion in the 12 mmHg group was significantly less than the 9 mmHg group (P < 0.05); 4At 0 h after exposure, cell invasion in the 15 mmHg group was significantly less than the 6 and 9 mmHg groups (P < 0.01); D: The invasion fluorescence intensities of Lovo before and 72 h after exposure to CO2 insufflation were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Seventy two hours after CO2 insufflation, there were no significant differences between the various insufflation pressure groups (P > 0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Results of intra-abdominal tumor nodules. A: Mesentery tumor nodules in the 15 mmHg group; B: Mesentery tumor nodules in the 6 mmHg group; C: Numbers of intra-abdominal tumor nodules in the various groups. The number of intra-abdominal tumor nodules in the 15 mmHg group (A) was significantly lower than those in 6 mmHg group (B) (aP = 0.046). The mean numbers of abdominal cavity nodules formed by the cells in each group are described in (C).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Survival time of the mice injected with SW1116 cells in the different groups (P = 0.426).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vittimberga FJ Jr, Foley DP, Meyers WC, Callery MP. Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg. 1998;227:326–334. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander RJ, Jaques BC, Mitchell KG. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet. 1993;341:249–250. - PubMed
    1. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–2059. - PubMed
    1. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:44–52. - PubMed
    1. Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, Li JW, Wang ML, Mao ZH, Hu YY, Dong F, Hu WG, Li DH, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:323–326. - PMC - PubMed