Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;87(2):368-90.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00561.x.

Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice

Jason M Satterfield  1 , Bonnie Spring, Ross C Brownson, Edward J Mullen, Robin P Newhouse, Barbara B Walker, Evelyn P Whitlock
Affiliations

Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice

Jason M Satterfield et al. Milbank Q. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Context: This article describes the historical context and current developments in evidence-based practice (EBP) for medicine, nursing, psychology, social work, and public health, as well as the evolution of the seminal "three circles" model of evidence-based medicine, highlighting changes in EBP content, processes, and philosophies across disciplines.

Methods: The core issues and challenges in EBP are identified by comparing and contrasting EBP models across various health disciplines. Then a unified, transdisciplinary EBP model is presented, drawing on the strengths and compensating for the weaknesses of each discipline.

Findings: Common challenges across disciplines include (1) how "evidence" should be defined and comparatively weighted; (2) how and when the patient's and/or other contextual factors should enter the clinical decision-making process; (3) the definition and role of the "expert"; and (4) what other variables should be considered when selecting an evidence-based practice, such as age, social class, community resources, and local expertise.

Conclusions: A unified, transdisciplinary EBP model would address historical shortcomings by redefining the contents of each model circle, clarifying the practitioner's expertise and competencies, emphasizing shared decision making, and adding both environmental and organizational contexts. Implications for academia, practice, and policy also are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Three-Circle Model of Evidence-Based Clinical Decisions
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
An Updated Three-Circle Model of Evidence-Based Clinical Decisions
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Elements of Evidence-Based Policy and Practice Source: Adapted from Haynes, Devereaux, and Guyatt 2002.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The Most Commonly Applied Framework in EBPH
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Our Revised EBP Model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) The Essentials of Master's Education for Advanced Practice Nursing. 1996. Available at http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Education/pdf/MasEssentials96.pdf (accessed June 3, 2008) - PubMed
    1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice. 1998. Available at http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Education/pdf/BaccEssentials98.pdf (accessed June 3, 2008)
    1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. 2006. Available at http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/pdf/Essentials.pdf (accessed June 3, 2008)
    1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) AACN “Essentials” Series. 2008. Available at http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education/essentials.htm (accessed March 2, 2008)
    1. American Nurses Association (ANA) Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. Washington, D.C: 2004a.

MeSH terms