Perceived negative consequences of donor gametes from male and female members of infertile couples
- PMID: 19523614
- PMCID: PMC2888643
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.049
Perceived negative consequences of donor gametes from male and female members of infertile couples
Abstract
Objective: To determine the views toward donor sperm and eggs of both men and women. The use of donor sperm or ova becomes an option for some infertile couples.
Design: Prospective cohort of infertile couples.
Setting: Eight California reproductive endocrinology practices.
Patient(s): Infertile couples (n=377) were recruited after an initial infertility clinic visit.
Main outcome measure(s): From questionnaires administered at recruitment, ratings concerning the impact of the use of donor gametes were assessed. Differences between men and women in attitudes toward donor gametes were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of attitudes toward gametes.
Result(s): Women's attitudes toward donor sperm were significantly more negative than their attitudes toward donor eggs (5.1+/-1.4 vs. 4.7+/-1.6). Similarly, male donor gamete attitude scores were higher for donor sperm compared with donor eggs (4.9+/-1.6 vs. 4.1+/-1.6). Both men and women agreed that the use of donor sperm was more likely to have negative effects on their relationship and negative societal ramifications. Female donor gamete attitude scores were predicted by marital status, race, and education, whereas men's scores were independent of all measured factors.
Conclusion(s): Both men and women view the use of donor sperm with more skepticism compared with the use of donor eggs, suggesting a unique underlying perception regarding the use of male donor gametes.
Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2005;23:1–174. - PubMed
-
- 2006 Guidelines for Gamete and Embryo Donation. Fertility and sterility. 2006;86:S38–50. - PubMed
-
- van Zyl JA, Menkveld R. Oligozoospermia: recent prognosis and the outcome of 73 pregnancies in oligozoospermic couples. Andrologia. 2006;38:87–91. - PubMed
-
- Kazem R, Thompson LA, Hamilton MP, Templeton A. Current attitudes towards egg donation among men and women. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 1995;10:1543–8. - PubMed
-
- Giltay JC, Kastrop PM, Tuerlings JH, Kremer JA, Tiemessen CH, Gerssen-Schoorl KB, et al. Subfertile men with constitutive chromosome abnormalities do not necessarily refrain from intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: a follow-up study on 75 Dutch patients. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 1999;14:318–20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
