Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep;20(9):1023-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1. Epub 2009 Jun 16.

Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting

Charles W Nager et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of the study was to determine whether successful incontinence pessary fitting or pessary size can be predicted by specific POPQ measurements in women without advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Methods: In a multicenter study, women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and POPQ stage < or = 2 were randomized to three treatment arms: (1) incontinence pessary, (2) behavioral therapy, or (3) both. This study evaluates incontinence pessary size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting in the 266 women assigned to treatment arms 1 and 3.

Results: Two hundred thirty-five women (92%) were successfully fitted with an incontinence ring (n = 122) or dish (n = 113). Hysterectomy, genital hiatus (GH), and GH/total vaginal length (TVL) ratios did not predict unsuccessful fitting (p > 0.05). However, mean TVL was greater in women successfully fitted (9.6 vs. 8.8 cm, p < 0.01). Final pessary diameter was not predicted by TVL, point D, or point C (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The vast majority of women with SUI can be successfully fitted with an incontinence pessary, but specific POPQ measures were not helpful in determining incontinence pessary size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Incontinence ring and incontinence dish (courtesy of Milex web site)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pessary diameter and TVL for women with cervix intact (n = 173)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pessary diameter and TVL for women with total hysterectomy (n = 54)

References

    1. Shah SM, Sultan AH, Thakar R (2006) The history and evolution of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 17:170–175 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nygaard I (1995) Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices. J Reprod Med 40:89–94 - PubMed
    1. Suarez GM, Baum NH, Jacobs J (1991) Use of standard contraceptive diaphragm in management of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 37:119–122 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Realini JP, Walters MD (1990) Vaginal diaphragm rings in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Am Board Fam Pract 3:99–103 - PubMed
    1. Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR (2001) Gynecologists' patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med 46:205–208 - PubMed

Publication types