Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3311-8.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0759. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

Variation in withholding of information in three monkey species

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Variation in withholding of information in three monkey species

Federica Amici et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Studies on tactical deception have reported that informed subordinates can withhold information from naive dominants, but they have not directly compared species' performance. Here, we compared the performance in two withholding-of-information tasks of three monkey species differing in the strictness of their dominance hierarchy and degree of fission-fusion dynamics: spider monkeys, capuchin monkeys and long-tailed macaques. Food was hidden from the dominants' view either inside an opaque box or in a transparent box that could only be opened by knowledgeable subordinates. All species were capable of withholding information, with subjects refraining from interacting with the box when the dominant was nearby. Spider monkeys were the most efficient at retrieving food, by timing it when the dominant was far from the box. Capuchin monkeys were also quite efficient when alone at the box, but they lost much of the food when manipulating the box with the dominant nearby. The results supported our predictions based on interspecific differences in the strictness of the dominance hierarchy and the degree of fission-fusion dynamics, with the former constraining the subjects' tendency to approach the box and the latter affecting the subjects' tendency to wait for the appropriate situation to retrieve the food.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Experimental set-up for the two tasks. (a) In OB, the subordinate subject (S) is informed about the presence of a preferred food item hidden inside an opaque box, while the dominant partner (D) is not informed. (b) In CB, the preferred food item is visible to both S and D, but only S is informed about the way to access it, by first taking the peg off, secondly pushing the box open and finally retrieving the food.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage of trials in which the food was retrieved by the subject, by the dominant or by nobody, as a function of task, species and subjects’ strategy (alone: the subject only approached the box without the dominant; together: the subject approached the box together with the dominant; no attempt: the subject never approached the box). (a) Opaque box and (b) clear box. White bar, dominant retrieves food; grey bar, nobody retrieves food; black bar, subject retrieves food.

References

    1. Albiach-Serrano A., Guillén-Salazar F., Call J.2007Mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus) solve the reverse contingency task without a modified procedure. Anim. Cogn. 10, 387–396 (doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0076-5) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amici F., Aureli F., Call J.2008Fission–fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility and inhibitory control in primates. Curr. Biol. 18, 1415–1419 (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.020) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson J. R., Kuroshima H., Kuwahata H., Fujita K., Vick S. J.2001Training squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) to deceive: acquisition and analysis of behavior toward cooperative and competitive trainers. J. Comp. Psychol. 115, 282–293 (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.115.3.282) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aureli F., Schaffner C. M.2008Social interactions, social relationships and the social system of spider monkeys. In Spider monkeys: behavior, ecology and evolution of the genus Ateles (ed. Campbell C. J.), pp. 236–265 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
    1. Aureli F., et al. 2008Fission–fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr. Anthropol. 48, 627–654 (doi:10.1086/586708) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources