Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Aug;116(9):1167-76.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02144.x. Epub 2009 May 27.

Effects of natural childbirth preparation versus standard antenatal education on epidural rates, experience of childbirth and parental stress in mothers and fathers: a randomised controlled multicentre trial

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of natural childbirth preparation versus standard antenatal education on epidural rates, experience of childbirth and parental stress in mothers and fathers: a randomised controlled multicentre trial

M Bergström et al. BJOG. 2009 Aug.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of antenatal education focussing on natural childbirth preparation with psychoprophylactic training versus standard antenatal education on the use of epidural analgesia, experience of childbirth and parental stress in first-time mothers and fathers.

Design: Randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Setting: Fifteen antenatal clinics in Sweden between January 2006 and May 2007.

Sample: A total of 1087 nulliparous women and 1064 of their partners.

Methods: Natural group: Antenatal education focussing on natural childbirth preparation with training in breathing and relaxation techniques (psychoprophylaxis). Standard care group: Standard antenatal education focussing on both childbirth and parenthood, without psychoprophylactic training. Both groups: Four 2-hour sessions in groups of 12 participants during third trimester of pregnancy and one follow-up after delivery.

Main outcome measures: Epidural analgesia during labour, experience of childbirth as measured by the Wijma Delivery Experience Questionnaire (B), and parental stress measured by the Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire.

Results: The epidural rate was 52% in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the experience of childbirth or parental stress between the randomised groups, either in women or men. Seventy percent of the women in the Natural group reported having used psychoprophylaxis during labour. A minority in the Standard care group (37%) had also used this method, but subgroup analysis where these women were excluded did not change the principal findings.

Conclusion: Natural childbirth preparation including training in breathing and relaxation did not decrease the use of epidural analgesia during labour, nor did it improve the birth experience or affect parental stress in early parenthood in nulliparous women and men, compared with a standard form of antenatal education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participants flow from recruitment to follow-up at 3 months postpartum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Description of the two models of antenatal education.

Comment in

References

    1. Fabian HM, Radestad IJ, Waldenstrom U. Characteristics of Swedish women who do not attend childbirth and parenthood education classes during pregnancy. Midwifery. 2004;20:226–35. - PubMed
    1. Dick-Read G. Childbirth Without Fear: The Principles and Practice of Natural Childbirth. New York, London: Harper & Brothers Publishers, Pinter & Martin; 2004. 1944.
    1. Lamaze F. Painless Childbirth : The Lamaze Method. Chicago, IL: Contemporary Books; 1984. 1956.
    1. Velvovsky IPK, Ploticher V, Shugom E. Painless Childbirth Through Psychoprophylaxis. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House; 1960.
    1. Fabian HM, Radestad IJ, Waldenstrom U. Childbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden. Women’s opinion and possible outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:436–43. - PubMed

Publication types