Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jul:(16):77-85.
doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.77.

Preventing risky drinking in first-year college women: further validation of a female-specific motivational-enhancement group intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Preventing risky drinking in first-year college women: further validation of a female-specific motivational-enhancement group intervention

Joseph W LaBrie et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Female college students have increased their alcohol consumption rates. The current study sought to replicate the effectiveness of a female-specific motivational-enhancement group intervention and extended previous work by adding a 6-month follow-up. The intervention included several motivational-enhancement components delivered in a group setting and included a group discussion of female-specific reasons for drinking.

Method: Participants were 285 first-year college women. Data collection consisted of an online pre-intervention questionnaire, 10 weeks of online follow-up assessment, and a 6-month online follow-up. Using a randomized design, participants chose a group session, blind to treatment status. Held during the first weeks of the first semester, 159 participants received the intervention and 126 participants received an assessment-only control.

Results: Using a repeated-measures analysis of covariance, intervention participants consumed significantly less than control participants on drinks per week (F = 11.86, 1/252 df, p < .001), maximum drinks (F = 11.90, 1/252 df, p < .001), and heavy episodic drinking events (F = 20.14, 1/252 df, p < .001) across 10 weeks of follow-up. However, these effects did not persist at the 6-month follow-up. Moderation effects were found for social motives on all drinking variables, such that the intervention was most effective for those women with higher social motives for drinking.

Conclusions: Efficacy was found for a female-specific motivational group intervention in creating less risky drinking patterns among first-year women, especially women with social motives for drinking. The effect dissipated by the second semester, suggesting the need for maintenance or booster sessions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated marginal means across 10 weeks of follow-up, controlling for pre-intervention drinking. Differences between control and intervention groups on drinks per week, maximum drinks, and heavy episodic drinking events.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated marginal means across 10 weeks, controlling for pre-intervention drinking. Differences between control and intervention groups on drinks per week as moderated by low and high social motives.

References

    1. Baer JS, Marlatt GA, Kivlahan DR, Fromme K, Larimer ME, Williams E. An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 1992;60:974–979. - PubMed
    1. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Carey MP, DeMartini KS. Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Addict. Behav. 2007;32:2469–2494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper ML. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychol. Assess. 1994;6:117–128.
    1. Cronin C. Reasons for drinking versus outcome expectancies in the prediction of college student drinking. Subst. Use Misuse. 1997;33:1287–1311. - PubMed
    1. Dimeff LA, Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Marlatt GA. Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students(BASICS): A Harm Reduction Approach. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.

Publication types

MeSH terms