Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;40(10):1487-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.03.015. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

The significance of marked nuclear atypia in grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Affiliations

The significance of marked nuclear atypia in grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Oluwole Fadare et al. Hum Pathol. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Approximately 10% to 15% of cases of grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia are found to have progressed to a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or higher at follow-up, and there are presently no reliable morphological predictors of this subset. It has recently been reported that cases of grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia that display marked nuclear atypia (defined as cases with at least 5 epithelial cells with nuclear enlargement of at least 5 times the size of an intermediate cell, and/or multinucleation of at least 5 nuclei.) have a substantially higher rate of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on short-term follow-up and may, therefore, require more aggressive initial management. We report herein our experience with a cohort of such cases. After a review of consecutive cervical biopsies, 352 cases with grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were classified into group 1 (grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with marked atypia, n = 31) and group 2 (grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia without marked atypia, n = 321). The average follow-up rates for groups 1 and 2 were 93.55% (29/31) and 90.65% (291/321), respectively. Average follow-up durations were 14.3 and 17.9 months, respectively. The follow-up high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion rate of the cases with marked atypia was 10.34%, as compared with 11.68% for cases without marked atypia. The follow-up interpretive frequency (in cytologic samples) of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" was significantly higher in group 1(19/29 versus 114/291, P = .009). However, no significant differences were identified between groups 1 and 2 regarding the interpretive frequencies of either high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (3/29 versus 34/291, P = 1) or "negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy" (6/29 versus 56/291, P = .8) in follow-up cytologic samples. In subsets of both groups in which high-risk human papillomavirus testing was performed in the Papanicolaou test sample that immediately preceded the index cervical biopsies, no significant differences in viral load were found. In conclusion, grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with marked atypia does not have a higher follow-up high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion rate than grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia without marked atypia in our patient population. Further studies are required to address the significance of marked atypia in grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and whether patients with this finding should be managed differently.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms