Randomized, double-blind, placebo-matched, multicenter trial of abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine with lopinavir/ritonavir for initial HIV treatment
- PMID: 19542866
- DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832cbcc2
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-matched, multicenter trial of abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine with lopinavir/ritonavir for initial HIV treatment
Abstract
Background: Abacavir sulfate/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) and tenofovir DF/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) are widely used nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for initial HIV-1 treatment. This is the first completed, randomized clinical trial to directly compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these agents, each in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive patients.
Methods: Six hundred and eighty-eight antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients were randomized in this double-blind, placebo-matched, multicenter, noninferiority study to receive a once-daily regimen of either ABC/3TC 600 mg/300 mg or TDF/FTC 300 mg/200 mg, both with lopinavir/ritonavir 800 mg/200 mg. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/ml at week 48 (missing = failure, switch included analysis) and the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events over 96 weeks.
Results: At week 48, 68% in the ABC/3TC group vs. 67% in the TDF/FTC group achieved an HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/ml (intent-to-treat exposed missing = failure, 95% confidence interval on the difference -6.63 to 7.40, P = 0.913), demonstrating the noninferiority of ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC at week 48. Noninferiority of the two regimens was sustained at week 96 (60% vs. 58%, respectively, 95% confidence interval -5.41 to 9.32, P = 0.603). In addition, efficacy of both regimens was similar in patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA >or= 100 000 copies/ml or CD4 cell counts below 50 cells/microl. Median CD4 recovery (ABC/3TC vs. TDF/FTC, cells/microl) was +250 vs. +247 by week 96. Premature study discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 6% of patients in both groups. Protocol-defined virologic failure occurred in 14% of patients in both groups.
Conclusion: Both ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC provided comparable antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability when each was combined with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive patients.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00244712.
Similar articles
-
Effects of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone on the efficacy of first-line boosted highly active antiretroviral therapy based on protease inhibitors: meta-regression analysis of 12 clinical trials in 5168 patients.HIV Med. 2009 Oct;10(9):527-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00724.x. HIV Med. 2009. PMID: 19785663 Review.
-
Examination of noninferiority, safety, and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir and raltegravir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir/ emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve subjects: the progress study, 48-week results.HIV Clin Trials. 2011 Sep-Oct;12(5):255-67. doi: 10.1310/hct1205-255. HIV Clin Trials. 2011. PMID: 22180523 Clinical Trial.
-
Switching to tenofovir/emtricitabine from abacavir/lamivudine in HIV-infected adults with raised cholesterol: effect on lipid profiles.Antivir Ther. 2012;17(6):1011-20. doi: 10.3851/IMP2305. Epub 2012 Aug 15. Antivir Ther. 2012. PMID: 22910324 Clinical Trial.
-
Simplification of antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir-emtricitabine or abacavir-Lamivudine: a randomized, 96-week trial.Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 15;49(10):1591-601. doi: 10.1086/644769. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. PMID: 19842973 Clinical Trial.
-
48-week efficacy and safety of dolutegravir relative to commonly used third agents in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e105653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105653. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25188312 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Treating women with HIV: is it different than treating men?Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012 Jun;9(2):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0116-x. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012. PMID: 22528764
-
Efficacy and biological safety of lopinavir/ritonavir based anti-retroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 23;5:8528. doi: 10.1038/srep08528. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 25704206 Free PMC article.
-
Abacavir and cardiovascular risk: reviewing the evidence.Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010 Aug;7(3):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s11904-010-0047-3. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010. PMID: 20521126 Review.
-
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of a Doravirine-Based, Three-Drug Regimen in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1 Positive Adults: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 20;13:676831. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.676831. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35517782 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative impact of antiretroviral drugs on markers of inflammation and immune activation during the first two years of effective therapy for HIV-1 infection: an observational study.BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Mar 4;14:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-122. BMC Infect Dis. 2014. PMID: 24589015 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
