Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;6(7):497-9.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1344. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

Simultaneous detection of many T-cell specificities using combinatorial tetramer staining

Affiliations

Simultaneous detection of many T-cell specificities using combinatorial tetramer staining

Evan W Newell et al. Nat Methods. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

The direct detection of antigen-specific T cells using tetramers of soluble peptide-major histocompatibilty complex (pMHC) molecules is widely used in both basic and clinical immunology. However, the number of specificities that can be assessed simultaneously has been a major limitation. Here we describe and validate a method using combinations of fluorescent pMHC tetramers to simultaneously detect and enrich for many (>or=15) T-cell specificities in a single human blood sample.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Combinatorial pMHC tetramer staining. Enriched CD8+ T cells from a CMV sero-positive donor were split into 15 aliquots and stained separately with the 15 CMV tetramer color combinations, washed, mixed together and run as a single sample. All panels show flow cytometry scatter plots. (a) Live CD8+ T cells were gated into four populations labeled b-e, based on threshold fluorescence of APC and PE-Cy7 as shown. Each population is represented in (b-e) and segregated based on PE and PE-Cy5 threshold fluorescence. The relative abundance of cells in each of the 15 tetramer-positive populations is represented in a bar chart in (f). In (g), cells from a different CMV sero-positive donor were stained with CMV tetramers labeled with PE, PE-Cy5, PE-Cy7, APC and all possible combinations of PE-Cy5.5 and APC-Cy7, washed, mixed and analyzed. A separate population was resolved for each possible color combination used. (h-l) Blood samples were processed and tetramer stained using a prepared cocktail of 15 different pMHC specificities represented by combinations of PE, PE-Cy5, PE-Cy7 and APC conjugated streptavidins (peptide scheme A, Supplementary Table 2 online). Cells were gated on PE and APC fluorescence (h) into populations labeled i-l, each of which is shown (i-l) further fractionated based on its PE-Cy5 and PE-Cy7 fluorescence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Specificity of combinatorial pMHC tetramer staining. (a) The percentage of cells labeled with the six different pMHC tetramers using two different staining schemes (Supplementary Table 2 online). (b) The percentage of cells stained with the indicated pMHC tetramers in cells co-cultured with T2 cells in the presence of a control peptide (HCV peptide, black bars) or the peptide corresponding to the pMHC tetramer reagent (grey bars); representative of three independent experiments. (c) Tetramer staining from four donor samples, each stained separately with 15 different PE-labeled pMHC tetramers (scheme C; Supplementary Table 2 online) is plotted on the x axis. Staining of the same sample with three separate preparations of combinatorial pMHC tetramer cocktails (Supplementary Table 2 online) is plotted +/- SEM on the y axis (d) The percentage of cells detected for each pMHC specificity before (gray bars) and after tetramer enrichment (black bars) using peptide scheme D (Supplementary Table 2).

Comment in

References

    1. Matsui K, Boniface JJ, Reay PA, et al. Science. 1991;254(5039):1788. - PubMed
    1. Altman JD, Moss PA, Goulder PJ, et al. Science. 1996;274(5284):94. - PubMed
    1. Danke NA, Kwok WW. J Immunol. 2003;171(6):3163. - PubMed
    1. Serbina N, Pamer EG. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15(4):436. - PubMed
    1. Kita H, He XS, Gershwin ME. Autoimmun Rev. 2003;2(1):43. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms