Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions
- PMID: 19543487
- PMCID: PMC2698617
- DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.2.101
Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions
Abstract
Background/aims: Techniques for endoscopic evaluation of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions include conventional endoscopy, jumbo biopsy, endoscopic ultrasonogrphy (EUS), EUS-guided fine needle aspiration, and endoscopic submucosal resection. However, these procedures have many limitations, such as low diagnostic yields and high complication rates. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic yield for tissue sampling of incidental subepithelial lesions using the bite-on-bite technique.
Methods: One hundred and forty subepithelial lesions were found in 129 patients during conventional diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy by one examiner from October 2003 to November 2004. Bite-on-bite biopsies with conventional-sized forceps were taken from 36 patients having 37 lesions that did not appear to be hypervascular or to have a thick overlying epithelium. Two to eight bites were performed to obtain submucosal tissue for one lesion.
Results: The bite-on-bite technique was diagnostic in 14 of the 37 lesions (38%). Blood oozing for more than 30 seconds occurred in five cases, but was easily controlled by epinephrine injection (2 cases) or hemoclip (3 cases). The diagnostic yield tended to be higher in the esophagus than in the stomach and duodenum (54% vs. 28%, p=0.109).
Conclusions: The bite-on-bite technique for subepithelial lesions is an effective and safe method in selected cases. This technique may be useful for incidental subepithelial lesions, especially those of the esophagus, except for ones with a high risk of bleeding or thick overlying epithelium.
Keywords: Biopsy; Endoscopic ultrasonogrphy; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Subepithelial lesion.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jul;64(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.027. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16813799
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided deep and large biopsy for diagnosis of gastric infiltrating tumors with negative malignant endoscopy biopsies.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3607-13. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3607. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25834327 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic yield and safety of jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with subepithelial lesions of the upper and lower GI tract.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.032. Epub 2012 Mar 15. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22425270
-
Upper Gastrointestinal Involvement in Crohn Disease: Histopathologic and Endoscopic Findings.South Med J. 2015 Nov;108(11):695-700. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000373. South Med J. 2015. PMID: 26539952 Review.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy for pancreatic masses, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes.World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 14;27(26):4194-4207. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4194. World J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34326619 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Giant Brunner's gland hyperplasia of the duodenum successfully resected en bloc by endoscopic mucosal resection: A case report.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jun 16;16(6):368-375. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i6.368. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38946860 Free PMC article.
-
Utility and advantage of the unroofing technique for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.DEN Open. 2024 Jan 19;4(1):e332. doi: 10.1002/deo2.332. eCollection 2024 Apr. DEN Open. 2024. PMID: 38250518 Free PMC article.
-
When to puncture, when not to puncture: Submucosal tumors.Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Apr;3(2):98-108. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.131038. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014. PMID: 24955339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:425469. doi: 10.1155/2015/425469. Epub 2015 Aug 11. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015. PMID: 26347772 Free PMC article.
-
How Can We Obtain Tissue from a Subepithelial Lesion for Pathologic Diagnosis?Clin Endosc. 2017 Jan;50(1):6-7. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.016. Epub 2017 Jan 30. Clin Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28147474 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Cantor MJ, Davila RE, Faigel DO. Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS:a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:29–34. - PubMed
-
- Hwang JH, Kimmey MB. The incidental upper gastrointestinal subepithelial mass. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:301–307. - PubMed
-
- Kaneko E, Kumagai J, Honda N, Nakamura S, Kino I. Evaluation of the new giant-biopsy forceps in the diagnosis of mucosal and submucosal gastric lesions. Endoscopy. 1983;15:322–326. - PubMed
-
- Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K, Takakuwa H. Gastric aberrant pancreas: EUS analysis in comparison with the histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:493–497. - PubMed
-
- Kojima T, Takahashi H, Parra-Blanco A, Kohsen K, Fujita R. Diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract by endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:516–522. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical