Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;24(2):101-5.
doi: 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.2.101. Epub 2009 Jun 8.

Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions

Affiliations

Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions

Jeong-Seon Ji et al. Korean J Intern Med. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Background/aims: Techniques for endoscopic evaluation of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions include conventional endoscopy, jumbo biopsy, endoscopic ultrasonogrphy (EUS), EUS-guided fine needle aspiration, and endoscopic submucosal resection. However, these procedures have many limitations, such as low diagnostic yields and high complication rates. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic yield for tissue sampling of incidental subepithelial lesions using the bite-on-bite technique.

Methods: One hundred and forty subepithelial lesions were found in 129 patients during conventional diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy by one examiner from October 2003 to November 2004. Bite-on-bite biopsies with conventional-sized forceps were taken from 36 patients having 37 lesions that did not appear to be hypervascular or to have a thick overlying epithelium. Two to eight bites were performed to obtain submucosal tissue for one lesion.

Results: The bite-on-bite technique was diagnostic in 14 of the 37 lesions (38%). Blood oozing for more than 30 seconds occurred in five cases, but was easily controlled by epinephrine injection (2 cases) or hemoclip (3 cases). The diagnostic yield tended to be higher in the esophagus than in the stomach and duodenum (54% vs. 28%, p=0.109).

Conclusions: The bite-on-bite technique for subepithelial lesions is an effective and safe method in selected cases. This technique may be useful for incidental subepithelial lesions, especially those of the esophagus, except for ones with a high risk of bleeding or thick overlying epithelium.

Keywords: Biopsy; Endoscopic ultrasonogrphy; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Subepithelial lesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of subepithelial lesions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bite-on-bite biopsy with conventional-sized forceps. (A) Incidental subepithelial lesion in the esophagus during diagnostic endoscopy, (B), (C), and (D) each bite is directly on top of the previous bite in an attempt to burrow into the lesion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cantor MJ, Davila RE, Faigel DO. Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS:a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:29–34. - PubMed
    1. Hwang JH, Kimmey MB. The incidental upper gastrointestinal subepithelial mass. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:301–307. - PubMed
    1. Kaneko E, Kumagai J, Honda N, Nakamura S, Kino I. Evaluation of the new giant-biopsy forceps in the diagnosis of mucosal and submucosal gastric lesions. Endoscopy. 1983;15:322–326. - PubMed
    1. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K, Takakuwa H. Gastric aberrant pancreas: EUS analysis in comparison with the histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:493–497. - PubMed
    1. Kojima T, Takahashi H, Parra-Blanco A, Kohsen K, Fujita R. Diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract by endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:516–522. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms