Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;468(2):466-71.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0935-2. Epub 2009 Jun 20.

Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups

Affiliations

Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups

Yona Kosashvili et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Acetabular revision of failed cages or rings may be facilitated by previously placed bone graft, enabling the use of highly porous cementless hemispheric cups. We retrospectively reviewed all 15 patients who had conversion of failed antiprotrusion cages (10 patients) or roof rings (five patients) to cementless cups. All patients had restoration of bone stock (three major column, eight morselized, four combined bone grafts) performed in conjunction with their index cage or ring reconstruction arthroplasty. The minimum followup was 24 months (average, 48.3 months; range, 24-72 months). Failure was defined as radiographic cup migration. In 12 of the 15 patients, there was no radiographic change in cup position at the last followup or symptoms indicative of loosening. The average Harris hip scores improved from 31 (range, 15-48) to 69 (range, 56-87) at latest followup. Cup failure occurred in three patients. In two patients, the failed cups were revised; the third patient refused additional surgery. Our experience suggests treatment of failed cages by highly porous cementless cups is a reasonable option. However, we recommend patients be followed closely to detect cup migration, which can occur until satisfactory bony ingrowth occurs.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A 76-year-old patient presented with a failed antiprotrusion cage. Note the broken hardware and a distorted ischium.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Postoperative radiographs of the patient at 6 weeks postconversion from a failed antiprotrusion cage to trabecular metal cup. Note that the broken screws did not require removal and were left in situ.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Postoperative radiographs of the patient at 2 years postconversion from failed cage to trabecular metal cup. There is no change in cup position or presence of radiolucent lines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boscainos PJ, Kellett CF, Maury AC, Backstein D, Gross AE. Management of periacetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:159–165. - PubMed
    1. Cabanela ME. Reconstruction rings and bone graft in total hip revision surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:255–262. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70324-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, Steinberg ME, Stulberg SD, Wedge JH. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;243:126–137. - PubMed
    1. Della Valle CJ. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:96–100. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Etienne G, Bezwada HP, Hungerford DS, Mont MA. The incorporation of morsellized bone grafts in cementless acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:241–246. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000145889.94276.61. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms