Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a comparative study of particulate versus non-particulate steroids
- PMID: 19543892
- DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0735-5
Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a comparative study of particulate versus non-particulate steroids
Abstract
Objective: To determine if a particulate steroid which has a risk for embolic infarct would be more effective than a non-particulate steroid for transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The purpose of this study was (1) to compare the effect of cervical TFESI using particulate (e.g., triamcinolone) and non-particulate (e.g., dexamethasone) steroids and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of cervical TFESI in general.
Materials and methods: From January 2006 to August 2008, 159 consecutive patients [male:female (M:F) 89:70; mean age 53 years, range 33-75 years] who underwent cervical TFESI were included in this non-randomized study. For cervical TFESI, triamcinolone was injected into 97 patients and dexamethasone into 62 patients. Short-term follow-up was conducted within 1 month. The outcome was classified as effective or ineffective. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the difference of outcome according to the injected steroid (triamcinolone vs dexamethasone). Other possible outcome predictors, such as age, gender, duration of radiculopathy, predominant symptom, attack of radiculopathy, cause of radiculopathy, number of nerve root compression levels, previous operation, and failure of previous interlaminar epidural injection, were also analyzed.
Results: Cervical TFESI using triamcinolone (78/97, 80.4%) was slightly more effective than that using dexamethasone (43/62, 69.4%), which was not significant (P = 0.129). In general, cervical TFESIs were effective in 121 of 159 patients (76.1%) at short-term follow-up. The only significant outcome predictor was whether the patient had had a previous operation (6/13, 46/2%) or not (115/146, 78.8%) (P = 0.015).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference between particulate or non-particulate steroid for the effect of cervical TFESI. Cervical TFESI was effective in managing cervical radiculopathy in general.
Similar articles
-
The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids betamethasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections.Pain Med. 2013 Nov;14(11):1650-7. doi: 10.1111/pme.12214. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Pain Med. 2013. PMID: 23899304
-
Pain Reduction and Repeat Injections After Transforaminal Epidural Injection With Particulate Versus Nonparticulate Steroid for the Treatment of Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy.PM R. 2016 Nov;8(11):1039-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 6. PM R. 2016. PMID: 27060648
-
Comparison of pain score reduction using triamcinolone vs. dexamethasone in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;92(9):768-75. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318282c9f2. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013. PMID: 23370580
-
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal and Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in Radicular Pain due to Cervical Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Pain Physician. 2022 Dec;25(9):E1351-E1366. Pain Physician. 2022. PMID: 36608007
-
Transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of lumbosacral radicular pain caused by epidural lipomatosis: a case series and review.J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):181-90. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130434. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24254495 Review.
Cited by
-
Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for unilateral cervical radiculopathy: comparison of midline and paramedian approaches for efficacy.Korean J Radiol. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):604-12. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.604. Epub 2015 May 13. Korean J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25995690 Free PMC article.
-
Pain reduction after lumbar epidural injections using particulate versus non-particulate steroids: intensity of the baseline pain matters.Eur Radiol. 2019 Jul;29(7):3379-3389. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06108-9. Epub 2019 Mar 18. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30887207
-
Epidural steroid injection-related events requiring hospitalisation or emergency room visits among 52,935 procedures performed at a single centre.Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):418-427. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4977-7. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 28726118
-
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of epidural steroid injection using a nonparticulate steroid, dexamethasone or betamethasone: a double-blind, randomized, crossover, clinical trial.Korean J Pain. 2022 Jul 1;35(3):336-344. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.3.336. Korean J Pain. 2022. PMID: 35768989 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of Epidural Corticosteroid Injections.Drugs R D. 2016 Mar;16(1):19-34. doi: 10.1007/s40268-015-0119-3. Drugs R D. 2016. PMID: 26715572 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources