Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of 3D US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation
- PMID: 19543893
- DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0734-6
Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of 3D US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic reliability of 3D US with MR arthrography in diagnosing supraspinatus tendon tears, with arthroscopic findings used as the standard.
Materials and methods: In a prospective study 50 patients who later underwent arthroscopic surgery of the rotator cuff were examined pre-operatively by 3D US with MR arthrography. The presence or absence of a full- or partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear and the tear size as demonstrated by each imaging and arthroscopy was recorded. The tear size was divided into three grades: small (<1 cm), medium (1-3 cm), and large (>3 cm).
Results: The arthroscopic diagnosis was a full-thickness tear in 40 patients, partial-thickness tears in 5, and intact supraspinatus tendon in 5. 3D US correctly diagnosed 35 out of 40 full-thickness tears and MR arthrography 39 out of 40 full-thickness tears. Regarding partial-thickness tears, 3D US underestimated 2 cases as no tear and overestimated 1 case as a full-thickness tear. MR arthrography underestimated 1 case as a partial-thickness tear and overestimated 2 cases as full-thickness and partial-thickness tears respectively. 3D US and MR arthrography yield a sensitivity for full-thickness tears of 87.5% and 97.5% with specificity of 90.0% and 90.0%. Based on the grading system, 3D US measurements correctly predicted the tear size of 23 (65.7%) of the 35 full-thickness tears and MR arthrography 30 (75.0%) of the 39 full-thickness tears.
Conclusion: Three-dimensional ultrasound seems to be a promising imaging modality comparable to MR arthrography for the assessment of the supraspinatus tendon tears.
Similar articles
-
Tears of the supraspinatus tendon: assessment with indirect magnetic resonance arthrography in 67 patients with arthroscopic correlation.Acta Radiol. 2009 Nov;50(9):1057-63. doi: 10.3109/02841850903232723. Acta Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19863417
-
3-T MRI of the shoulder: is MR arthrography necessary?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):86-92. doi: 10.2214/ajr.08.1097. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. PMID: 19098184
-
Supraspinatus tendon tears at 3.0 T shoulder MR arthrography: diagnosis with 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus 2D conventional sequences.Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Nov;41(11):1401-10. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1361-1. Epub 2012 Feb 10. Skeletal Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22322904
-
Imaging of degenerative and posttraumatic disease in the shoulder joint with ultrasound.Eur J Radiol. 2000 Aug;35(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00227-8. Eur J Radiol. 2000. PMID: 10963917 Review.
-
Diagnostic performance of long head of biceps tendon tears on MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):4309-4320. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10521-6. Epub 2023 Dec 27. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38148406
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of 3-dimensional shoulder ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(37):e12405. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012405. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30213014 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the morphologic evaluation of rotator cuff tear: a prospective study.Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2331-2339. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09213-4. Epub 2022 Nov 24. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36418625
-
Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Feb 5;8(2):2325967119900356. doi: 10.1177/2325967119900356. eCollection 2020 Feb. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32076627 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Three-dimensional sonography has satisfied accuracy for detecting rotator cuff tears.Front Surg. 2024 May 15;11:1411816. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1411816. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 38812755 Free PMC article.
-
[Ultrasound in rheumatology. What's new?].Z Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;72(2):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s00393-012-1066-9. Z Rheumatol. 2013. PMID: 23456366 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical