Asymmetry of genetic variation in fitness-related traits: apparent stabilizing selection on g(max)
- PMID: 19545265
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00759.x
Asymmetry of genetic variation in fitness-related traits: apparent stabilizing selection on g(max)
Abstract
The maintenance of genetic variation in traits closely associated with fitness remains a key unresolved issue in evolutionary genetics. One important qualification on the observation of genetic variation in fitness-related traits is that such traits respond asymmetrically to selection, evolving to a greater extent in the direction of lower fitness. Here we test the hypothesis that standing genetic variation in fitness-related traits is principally maintained for unfit phenotypes. Male Drosophila bunnanda vary in mating success (the primary determinant of male fitness) due to female mate choice. We used competitive mating success to partitioning males into two groups: successful (high fitness) and unsuccessful (low fitness). Relative to successful males, unsuccessful males harbored considerably greater levels of additive genetic variation for sexual signaling traits. This genetic asymmetry was detected for a multivariate trait that we demonstrated was not directly under stabilizing sexual selection, leading us to conclude the trait was under apparent stabilizing selection. Consequently, our results suggest genetic variance might be biased toward low fitness even for traits that are not themselves the direct targets of selection. Simple metrics of genetic variance are unlikely to be adequate descriptors of the complex nature of the genetic basis of traits under selection.
Similar articles
-
An evolutionary limit to male mating success.Evolution. 2008 Jun;62(6):1528-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00379.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18. Evolution. 2008. PMID: 18363864
-
Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.Evolution. 2012 Oct;66(10):3101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01658.x. Epub 2012 May 5. Evolution. 2012. PMID: 23025601
-
Sexual conflict and the maintenance of multivariate genetic variation.Evolution. 2010 Jun;64(6):1697-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00932.x. Epub 2009 Dec 28. Evolution. 2010. PMID: 20050914
-
A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):173-211. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2006.00004.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007. PMID: 17437557 Review.
-
Behavioral genetics of Drosophila ananassae.Genet Mol Res. 2003 Dec 30;2(4):394-409. Genet Mol Res. 2003. PMID: 15011143 Review.
Cited by
-
Why does allometry evolve so slowly?Integr Comp Biol. 2019 Nov 1;59(5):1429-1440. doi: 10.1093/icb/icz099. Integr Comp Biol. 2019. PMID: 31198948 Free PMC article.
-
The juvenile social environment introduces variation in the choice and expression of sexually selected traits.Ecol Evol. 2012 May;2(5):1036-47. doi: 10.1002/ece3.230. Ecol Evol. 2012. PMID: 22837847 Free PMC article.
-
Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.Genetics. 2015 May;200(1):371-84. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.175489. Epub 2015 Mar 16. Genetics. 2015. PMID: 25783700 Free PMC article.
-
Do slower movers have lower reproductive success and higher mutation load?Evol Lett. 2018 Nov 12;2(6):590-598. doi: 10.1002/evl3.87. eCollection 2018 Dec. Evol Lett. 2018. PMID: 30564442 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases