Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2009 May;106(19):329-34.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0329. Epub 2009 May 8.

Cowpox virus infection in pet rat owners: not always immediately recognized

Affiliations
Case Reports

Cowpox virus infection in pet rat owners: not always immediately recognized

Christian Becker et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 May.

Erratum in

  • Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 May;106(22):376

Abstract

Background: The aim of this article is to make physicians of all specialties aware of the possible variations of clinical course in human cowpox infection. This has been a matter of current interest since the detection of a first cluster of infections among owners of white pet rats in the Krefeld area in the spring of 2008. Two further cases arose in the Krefeld area in November 2008, and there have since been multiple further reports from various regions in Germany and the neighboring countries.

Method: The authors report on the first six documented cases of infection with cowpox virus among young persons owning pet rats, with both typical and atypical clinical courses.

Results: The clinical, molecular biological, and serological findings confirmed cowpox virus infection in all six cases. The DNA sequence of the cowpox virus hemagglutinin gene was identical in all patients. The infections had arisen after direct contact with pet rats.

Conclusions: Molecular genetic analysis of the cases described here suggests that the observed occurrence of cowpox virus infection among human beings and pet rats in multiple geographical areas represents a unitary epidemiological event that has not yet come under control. Further cases can be expected.

Keywords: cowpox; keeping of animals; risk of infection; skin infection; zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1: Case 1, early stage cowpox lesion, onset of ulceration, on patient’s shoulder
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2: Case 1, fully developed ulcerated cowpox lesion on the forehead, with black scab and inflamed margin (photograph taken about a week after the photograph shown in figure 1)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3: Case 4, massive swelling of eyelid in cowpox infection, satellite lesion in nasal orbital angle
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4: Case 4, non-inflamed, scabby, older cowpox lesion on abdominal skin

Comment in

References

    1. Editorial: What’s new pussycat? Cowpox. Lancet. 1986;328 - PubMed
    1. Steinborn A, Essbauer S, Marsch W Ch. Kuh-/Katzenpocken-Infektion beim Menschen: Ein potentiell verkanntes Krankheitsbild. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003;128:607–610. - PubMed
    1. Pahlitzsch R, Hammarin AL, Widell A. A case of facial cellulitis and necrotizing lymphadenitis due to cowpox infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:737–742. - PubMed
    1. Bonnekoh B, Falk K, Reckling KF, et al. Cowpox infection transmitted from domestic cat. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008;6:210–213. - PubMed
    1. Eis-Hubinger AM, Gerritzen A, Schneweis KE, et al. Fatal cowpox-like virus infection transmitted by cat. Lancet. 1990;336 - PubMed

Publication types