Follicular and luteal phase endometrial thickness and echogenic pattern and pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation cycles
- PMID: 19548081
- PMCID: PMC2719070
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9312-z
Follicular and luteal phase endometrial thickness and echogenic pattern and pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation cycles
Abstract
Purpose: To study the effect of endometrial thickness (ET) and echogenic pattern (EP) in oocyte donation cycles upon pregnancy outcomes.
Methods: Seventy-nine cycles resulting in blastocyst embryo transfer were evaluated. Donors underwent ovarian hyperstimulation using rFSH and GnRH-antagonist. Recipients were synchronized to donors using GnRH-agonist down-regulation followed by fixed dose of estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) following hCG. Transvaginal ultrasound (US) obtained ET and EP 10-11 days after initiation of E2 and on day of embryo transfer. Primary outcome was ET and EP in pregnant and non-pregnant cycles. Stimulation and embryology data was analyzed in donors to assess differences prior to transfer.
Results: Fifty-nine cycles resulted in clinical pregnancy. No differences were observed in pregnant vs. non-pregnant cycles in proliferative or secretory ET and EP. Similar baseline and stimulation characteristics were found in pregnant and non-pregnant cycles. Regression analysis showed end thickness were not predictive of pregnancy outcomes.
Conclusions: Endometrial characteristics in recipients prior to and following progesterone were not predictive of pregnancy outcomes.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.089', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.089'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17239871', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17239871/'}]}
- McWilliams GD, Frattarelli JL. Changes in measured endometrial thickness predict in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(1):74–81. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.089. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.002', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.002'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17207799', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17207799/'}]}
- Amir W, Micha B, Ariel H, Liat LG, Jehoshua D, Adrian S. Predicting factors for endometrial thickness during treatment with assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):799–804. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.002. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.064', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.064'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17081537', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17081537/'}]}
- Richter KS, Bugge KR, Bromer JG, Levy MJ. Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1, 294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):53–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.064. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.09.020', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.09.020'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15705371', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15705371/'}]}
- Zhang X, Chen CH, Confino E, Barnes R, Milad M, Kazer RR. Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(2):336–40. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.09.020. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.057', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.057'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15482759', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15482759/'}]}
- Zenke U, Chetkowski RJ. Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipient-related determinants of success with donor eggs. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(4):850–6. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.057. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources