Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun 24;301(24):2571-7.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.888.

Long-term outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block

Susan Cheng  1 , Michelle J Keyes, Martin G Larson, Elizabeth L McCabe, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Daniel Levy, Emelia J Benjamin, Ramachandran S Vasan, Thomas J Wang
Affiliations

Long-term outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block

Susan Cheng et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Context: Prolongation of the electrocardiographic PR interval, known as first-degree atrioventricular block when the PR interval exceeds 200 milliseconds, is frequently encountered in clinical practice.

Objective: To determine the clinical significance of PR prolongation in ambulatory individuals.

Design, setting, and participants: Prospective, community-based cohort including 7575 individuals from the Framingham Heart Study (mean age, 47 years; 54% women) who underwent routine 12-lead electrocardiography. The study cohort underwent prospective follow-up through 2007 from baseline examinations in 1968-1974. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations of PR interval with the incidence of arrhythmic events and death.

Main outcome measures: Incident atrial fibrillation (AF), pacemaker implantation, and all-cause mortality.

Results: During follow-up, 481 participants developed AF, 124 required pacemaker implantation, and 1739 died. At the baseline examination, 124 individuals had PR intervals longer than 200 milliseconds. For those with PR intervals longer than 200 milliseconds compared with those with PR intervals of 200 milliseconds or shorter, incidence rates per 10 000 person-years were 140 (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-208) vs 36 (95% CI, 32-39) for AF, 59 (95% CI, 40-87) vs 6 (95% CI, 5-7) for pacemaker implantation, and 334 (95% CI, 260-428) vs 129 (95% CI, 123-135) for all-cause mortality. Corresponding absolute risk increases were 1.04% (AF), 0.53% (pacemaker implantation), and 2.05% (all-cause mortality) per year. In multivariable analyses, each 20-millisecond increment in PR was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .02) for AF, 1.22 (95% CI, 1.14-1.30; P < .001) for pacemaker implantation, and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02-1.13; P = .005) for all-cause mortality. Individuals with first-degree atrioventricular block had a 2-fold adjusted risk of AF (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.36-3.12; P < .001), 3-fold adjusted risk of pacemaker implantation (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.83-4.57; P < .001), and 1.4-fold adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.44, 95% CI, 1.09-1.91; P = .01).

Conclusion: Prolongation of the PR interval is associated with increased risks of AF, pacemaker implantation, and all-cause mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative examples of (a) a normal PR interval and (b) a prolonged PR interval detected by routine electrocardiography in the study sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves showing the cumulative unadjusted incidence of (a) atrial fibrillation, (b) pacemaker implantation, and (c) death, among individuals with baseline PR interval above or below the median (149 milliseconds).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves showing the cumulative unadjusted incidence of (a) atrial fibrillation, (b) pacemaker implantation, and (c) death, among individuals with baseline PR interval above or below the median (149 milliseconds).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves showing the cumulative unadjusted incidence of (a) atrial fibrillation, (b) pacemaker implantation, and (c) death, among individuals with baseline PR interval above or below the median (149 milliseconds).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Packard JM, Graettinger JS, Graybiel A. Analysis of the electrocardiograms obtained from 1000 young healthy aviators; ten year follow-up. Circulation. 1954;10:384–400. - PubMed
    1. Blackburn H, Taylor HL, Keys A. Coronary heart disease in seven countries. XVI. The electrocardiogram in prediction of five-year coronary heart disease incidence among men aged forty through fifty-nine. Circulation. 1970;41:I154–I161. - PubMed
    1. Rose G, Baxter PJ, Reid DD, McCartney P. Prevalence and prognosis of electrocardiographic findings in middle-aged men. Br Heart J. 1978;40:636–643. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erikssen J, Otterstad JE. Natural course of a prolonged PR interval and the relation between PR and incidence of coronary heart disease. A 7-year follow-up study of 1832 apparently healthy men aged 40–59 years. Clin Cardiol. 1984;7:6–13. - PubMed
    1. Schwartzman D. Atrioventricular block and atrioventricular dissociation. In: Zipes D, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2004. pp. 485–489.

Publication types