Predicting the results of rhinoplasty before surgery: Easy noses versus difficult noses
- PMID: 19554169
- PMCID: PMC2691557
- DOI: 10.1177/229255030801600209
Predicting the results of rhinoplasty before surgery: Easy noses versus difficult noses
Abstract
A major problem for many rhinoplastic surgeons is the ability to predict, before surgery, the difficulty of the procedure (whether the rhinoplasties will be technically easy or technically difficult to perform) and the success rate of the result (whether the rhinoplasty will likely give good results or poor ones).The present paper outlines a systematic approach to nasal analysis, allowing the surgeon to consistently estimate, before surgery, the degree of technical difficulty of each rhinoplasty, as well as predicting its future result in terms of patient satisfaction. This preoperative evaluation is based on the analysis of the skin texture and the osteocartilagenous framework on lateral and frontal views. It allows for the nose to be classified as green (easy), yellow (moderate) or red (difficult), depending on two factors: the degree of surgical difficulty and the expected patient's satisfaction with the result.The essence of the present paper is to introduce a simple, systematic approach to assist the novice rhinoplastic surgeon to assess the complexity, the risks and the expected outcome of a rhinoplasty in the preoperative period, rather than postoperatively.
L’un des problèmes majeurs pour de nombreux chirurgiens rhinoplasticiens est leur capacité de prédire la difficulté de l’intervention avant la chirurgie (la rhinoplastie sera-t-elle facile ou difficile sur le plan technique?) et son taux de succès (la rhinoplastie donnera-t-elle de bons ou de mauvais résultats?).
Le présent article décrit de manière succincte une approche systématique pour l’analyse du nez. Elle permet au chirurgien d’estimer de manière objective avant la chirurgie le degré de difficulté technique de chaque rhinoplastie et de prédire ainsi la satisfaction des patients. Cette évaluation préopératoire se fonde sur une analyse de la texture de la peau et des structures ostéocartilagineuses latérales et frontales. Elle permet de classifier les rhinoplasties en catégories assorties d’un code couleur : vert (faciles), jaune (modérées) ou rouge (difficiles) selon deux paramètres, soit degré de difficulté chirurgicale et satisfaction escomptée du patient vis-à-vis des résultats. Le but du présent article est d’expliquer une approche simple et systématique pour aider le chirurgien rhinoplasticien peu expérimenté à évaluer la complexité, les risques et l’issue escomptée d’une rhinoplastie à la phase préopératoire plutôt que postopératoire.
Keywords: Difficult; Easy; Predicting results; Rhinoplasty.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Wide-Open Dorsal Approach Rhinoplasty for Droopy Noses.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;39(1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0427-y. Epub 2014 Dec 6. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 25480746
-
Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon Experience and Patient Satisfaction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):e3798. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003798. eCollection 2021 Sep. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021. PMID: 34522571 Free PMC article.
-
Anthropometric Evaluation of Photographic Images Before and After Functional Nasal Surgery in Patients With Deviated Noses.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Sep;35(5):615-623. doi: 10.1177/1945892420983116. Epub 2020 Dec 22. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021. PMID: 33353375
-
Guidelines for Dorsum Preservation in Primary Rhinoplasty.Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Feb;37(1):53-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723827. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Facial Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33634452 Review.
-
Fundamental terms, considerations, and approaches in rhinoplasty.Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;3(2):15-25. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1995. PMID: 11873697 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of Approaches of Otorhinolaryngologists in Facial Plastic and Nasal Surgery: A Survey Study.Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;55(3):129-135. doi: 10.5152/tao.2017.2580. Epub 2017 Aug 14. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 29392070 Free PMC article.
-
A practical method for assessing nasal skin quality.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 May;270(6):1839-42. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2293-z. Epub 2012 Nov 30. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23197287
-
The Myrtiformis Muscle: Identification of a Forgotten Entity That Is Distinct From the Depressor Septi Nasi Muscle.Cureus. 2023 Mar 16;15(3):e36214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36214. eCollection 2023 Mar. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37065385 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Macgregor FC, Schaffner B. Screening patients for nasal plastic operations; sociologic and psychiatric considerations. Psychosom Med. 1950;12:277–91. - PubMed
-
- Phillips KA. Body dysmorphic disorder: The distress of imagined ugliness. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1138–49. - PubMed
-
- Rees TD. Selection of patients. In: Rees TD, editor. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1980.
-
- Housman SB. Psychological aspects of plastic surgery. In: McCarthy JG, editor. Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990.
-
- Hill G, Silver AG. Psychodynamic and esthetic motivations for plastic surgery. Psychosom Med. 1950;12:345–55. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources