Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Summer;16(2):69-75.
doi: 10.1177/229255030801600209.

Predicting the results of rhinoplasty before surgery: Easy noses versus difficult noses

Affiliations

Predicting the results of rhinoplasty before surgery: Easy noses versus difficult noses

Nabil Fanous et al. Can J Plast Surg. 2008 Summer.

Abstract

A major problem for many rhinoplastic surgeons is the ability to predict, before surgery, the difficulty of the procedure (whether the rhinoplasties will be technically easy or technically difficult to perform) and the success rate of the result (whether the rhinoplasty will likely give good results or poor ones).The present paper outlines a systematic approach to nasal analysis, allowing the surgeon to consistently estimate, before surgery, the degree of technical difficulty of each rhinoplasty, as well as predicting its future result in terms of patient satisfaction. This preoperative evaluation is based on the analysis of the skin texture and the osteocartilagenous framework on lateral and frontal views. It allows for the nose to be classified as green (easy), yellow (moderate) or red (difficult), depending on two factors: the degree of surgical difficulty and the expected patient's satisfaction with the result.The essence of the present paper is to introduce a simple, systematic approach to assist the novice rhinoplastic surgeon to assess the complexity, the risks and the expected outcome of a rhinoplasty in the preoperative period, rather than postoperatively.

L’un des problèmes majeurs pour de nombreux chirurgiens rhinoplasticiens est leur capacité de prédire la difficulté de l’intervention avant la chirurgie (la rhinoplastie sera-t-elle facile ou difficile sur le plan technique?) et son taux de succès (la rhinoplastie donnera-t-elle de bons ou de mauvais résultats?).

Le présent article décrit de manière succincte une approche systématique pour l’analyse du nez. Elle permet au chirurgien d’estimer de manière objective avant la chirurgie le degré de difficulté technique de chaque rhinoplastie et de prédire ainsi la satisfaction des patients. Cette évaluation préopératoire se fonde sur une analyse de la texture de la peau et des structures ostéocartilagineuses latérales et frontales. Elle permet de classifier les rhinoplasties en catégories assorties d’un code couleur : vert (faciles), jaune (modérées) ou rouge (difficiles) selon deux paramètres, soit degré de difficulté chirurgicale et satisfaction escomptée du patient vis-à-vis des résultats. Le but du présent article est d’expliquer une approche simple et systématique pour aider le chirurgien rhinoplasticien peu expérimenté à évaluer la complexité, les risques et l’issue escomptée d’une rhinoplastie à la phase préopératoire plutôt que postopératoire.

Keywords: Difficult; Easy; Predicting results; Rhinoplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1)
Figure 1)
Simplified illustration for the green / yellow / red light nose classification. (Note: a free, plastified, coloured illustration is available for teaching purposes, by contacting the authors)
Figure 2)
Figure 2)
Examples of ‘red light’ noses. Patient 1: (A and B) Preoperative photographs of a 37-year-old man with a severe pyramid deformity, classifying it as a red light nose, even if he had a prominent hump (which he does not); (C and D) postoperative results 11 months later. Patient 2: (E and F) Preoperative photographs of a 18-year-old woman with a severe tip deformity and marked pyramid deviation, both classifying her into the red light category, in spite of her prominent hump; (G and H) postoperative results six months later. Patient 3: (I and J) Preoperative photographs of a 19-year-old woman with a saddle dorsum deformity; (K and L) postoperative results five years (62 months) later
Figure 3)
Figure 3)
Examples of ‘green light’ noses. Patient 1: (A and B) Preoperative photographs of a 19-year-old man with a prominent dorsal hump, without any other significant nasal deformities; (C and D) postoperative results 12 months later. Patient 2: (E and F) Preoperative photographs of a 25-year-old woman with a significant hump and a mild tip deformity; (G and H) postoperative results more than four years (52 months) later
Figure 4)
Figure 4)
Example of a ‘yellow light’ nose, in between a ‘green light’ and a ‘red light’ nose, but closer to a green light one. A and B Preoperative pictures of a 54-year-old woman with a moderate hump and a mild tip problem; C and D Postoperative results 2.5 years (30 months) later

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macgregor FC, Schaffner B. Screening patients for nasal plastic operations; sociologic and psychiatric considerations. Psychosom Med. 1950;12:277–91. - PubMed
    1. Phillips KA. Body dysmorphic disorder: The distress of imagined ugliness. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1138–49. - PubMed
    1. Rees TD. Selection of patients. In: Rees TD, editor. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1980.
    1. Housman SB. Psychological aspects of plastic surgery. In: McCarthy JG, editor. Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990.
    1. Hill G, Silver AG. Psychodynamic and esthetic motivations for plastic surgery. Psychosom Med. 1950;12:345–55. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources