Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;35(9):1593-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1551-z. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

Relationships, trust, decision-making and quality of care in a paediatric intensive care unit

Affiliations

Relationships, trust, decision-making and quality of care in a paediatric intensive care unit

Lauraine Vivian et al. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the care-giving practices of health-care practitioners in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through their qualitative insights, reflections and experience in participatory action research.

Design and methods: Qualitative research in the form of 'participatory action research' was used to gather data from three sources within the unit: focus groups within disciplines, observations within the PICU, and semi-structured interviews. All staff members were active collaborators and equal stakeholders in the decision-making process, research and feedback.

Setting: The paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital (RCWMCH).

Participants: All staff members from various disciplines working in the PICU.

Results: Staff members described problems with respect to relationships, trust and decision-making within care-giving practices.

Conclusion: The study qualitatively describes how poor communication amongst staff members in respect of relationships and decision-making impacted on trust and how this tended to compromise care-giving practices in the PICU. The data suggested that this was more evident in informal rather than formal clinical decision-making procedures. The strength of the study was that the participatory action design in the research allowed staff members to address the very dynamics that they themselves cited as problematic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Jun;16(3):151-63 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Apr;16(2):61-2 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Dec;16(6):373-83 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):3116-7 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2003 Dec 20;327(7429):1424-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources