Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 May;27(4):419-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.03.020.

A test of syndromic surveillance using a severe acute respiratory syndrome model

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A test of syndromic surveillance using a severe acute respiratory syndrome model

David J Wallace et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 May.

Abstract

Objectives: We describe a field simulation that was conducted using volunteers to assess the ability of 3 hospitals in a network to manage a large influx of patients with a potentially communicable disease. This drill provided the opportunity to evaluate the ability of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene's (NYC-DOHMH) emergency department chief complaint syndromic surveillance system to detect a cluster of patients with febrile respiratory illness.

Methods: The evaluation was a prospective simulation. The clinical picture was modeled on severe acute respiratory syndrome symptoms. Forty-four volunteers participated in the drill as mock patients.

Results: Records from 42 patients (95%) were successfully transmitted to the NYC-DOHMH. The electronic chief complaint for 24 (57%) of these patients indicated febrile or respiratory illness. The drill did not generate a statistical signal in the NYC-DOHMH SaTScan analysis. The 42 drill patients were classified in 8 hierarchical categories based on chief complaints: sepsis (2), cold (3), diarrhea (2), respiratory (20), fever/flu (4), vomit (3), and other (8). The number of respiratory visits, while elevated on the day of the drill, did not appear particularly unusual when compared with the 14-day baseline period used for spatial analyses.

Conclusions: This drill with a cluster of patients with febrile respiratory illness failed to trigger a signal from the NYC-DOHMH emergency department chief complaint syndromic surveillance system. This highlighted several limitations and challenges to syndromic surveillance monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Emergency department respiratory syndrome visits of patients aged 13 years or older during the month before January 19, 2005 (ED preparedness drill at 3 participating hospitals and citywide).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buehler J.W., Hopkins R.S., Overhage J.M., Sosin D.M., Tong V. Framework for evaluating public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks: recommendations from the CDC Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004;53(RR-5):1–11. - PubMed
    1. Thacker S.B., Berkelman R.L. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164–190. - PubMed
    1. Dato V., Wagner M.M., Fapohunda A. How outbreaks of infectious disease are detected: a review of surveillance systems and outbreaks. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(5):464–471. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heffernan R., Mostashari F., Das D., Karpati A., Kulldorff M., Weiss D. Syndromic surveillance in public health practice, New York City. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(5):858–864. - PubMed
    1. Carrico R., Goss L. Syndromic surveillance: hospital emergency department participation during the Kentucky Derby Festival. Disaster Manag Response. 2005;3(3):73–79. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types