Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2009 Jun 30;54(1):77-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.022.

Will 3.0-T make coronary magnetic resonance angiography competitive with computed tomography angiography?

Christopher T Sibley, David A Bluemke
Editorial

Will 3.0-T make coronary magnetic resonance angiography competitive with computed tomography angiography?

Christopher T Sibley et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Pouleur ACMD, et al. Direct Comparison of Whole-Heart Navigator-Gated Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography and 40- and 64-Slice Multidetector Row Computed Tomography to Detect the Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients Scheduled for Conventional Coronary Angiography. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2008;1(2):114–121. - PubMed
    1. Maintz D, et al. Whole-Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Value for the Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses in Comparison to Multislice Computed Tomography Angiography. Informa Healthcare. 2007:967–973. - PubMed
    1. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007;298(3):317–323. - PubMed
    1. Wen H, et al. The Intrinsic Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Human Cardiac Imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 1997;125(1):65–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommer T, et al. Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: Initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2005;234(3):718–725. - PubMed

MeSH terms